In the comments section of my last piece on the Jewish hoax of Libertarianism, we were visited by yet another troll pushing this worn-out nonsense theology. As it is my goal to completely crush this destructive way of viewing the social order, I have once again given a response to this enemy agent (note that I do not care if he is a Jew or someone who has been brainwashed by a Jew to behave exactly like a Jew – the effect is the same, and he should be dealt with in the same manner).
A person calling himself “blackacidlizzard” came to evangelize for his faith while purposefully attempting to cause confusion. Note that in his last line, he claims that he was not arguing that an implementation of Libertarian economic policy would result in a positive economic situation in White countries, and attempts to attach a clever insult to his suggestion that by “assuming” that he was promoting Libertarianism because he believes it would have a positive effect, I was putting words in his mouth. Logically, that would mean he was promoting the ideology for some other reason than that he believes it would have a positive effect on the economic order. Just imagine the weaselly audacity of such an argumentative technique – “I never said that what I am promoting as a good system would have a positive effect – that is just the voices in your head.” This is the depths that these Jews (and their minions) are willing to sink to.
It is worthwhile to share a couple quotes from the Eternal Avatar of Truth and Justice, Adolf Hitler. These are from chapter 2 of Mein Kampf (Ford translation), where he is speaking of his debates with the Social Democrats – a Jewish movement, just as Libertarianism is a Jewish movement. Emphasis mine.
This is how I came to understand mankind. Through the years, my views broadened and deepened but there was no need to change my way of thinking. The more I understood the outer nature of Social Democracy, the more I longed to understand the inner core of the doctrine. The official party literature was not very useful here. It is incorrect in both details and in the proof it offers for economic questions. It is also untruthful in its discussion of political aims. Besides, I was especially repelled by the dishonest and unethical manner in which it was presented. Sentences are written using a lot of vague words with unintelligible meanings that are as clever as they are senseless. Only those unconventional types rotting among us could possibly feel at home in this intellectual maze. They scrape some “spiritual experience” from this artsy literary manure, and the message is assisted by the humility of our people who think something is deep and wise just because they don’t understand it.
In the same chapter, he goes on about the pretentious and vile political presentation of the Jews.
The more disputes I had with them, the better acquainted I became with their arguing techniques. First, they would count on the stupidity of their adversaries, and then, if there was no way out, they pretended to be stupid themselves. If all else failed, they claimed they did not understand, or, being challenged, they would instantly jump to another subject and talk about obvious truths. If these were agreed on, they immediately applied them to entirely different matters. When they were caught off guard, they would avoid the conversation and claim they had no knowledge or understanding of the issue. No matter where you seized one of these apostles, your hand grasped slimy ooze, which spurted through your fingers, only to unite again the next moment. If your argument really gave a man a shattering defeat in front of others, he could do nothing but agree. You might suppose that this was one step forward, but how surprised you would be the following day! The next morning you will find that Jew has not even the slightest memory of yesterday and continues to repeat his old mischievous nonsense as if nothing at all had happened. When pressed about the previous conversation, he would pretend astonishment and could remember nothing at all except the truth of his statements, which he felt had been proven the day before.
Frequently I was simply paralyzed. It was hard to know what to admire the most: their fluency or their artistry in lying. Gradually, I began to hate them.
The exact methods presently being used by the Jew Libertarians trying to dictate the narrative of our resistance movement, which you will see an example of below, were used by the Jew Communists trying to dictate the narrative of the White resistance movement in 1920s Germany. These people simply do not stop, and they will not ever abandon a technique that works. This method of using vague and slightly confusing language along with overly-complex sounding gibberish that people take to be meaningful simply because they cannot understand it, mixed in with trigger words, will always work, because it preys on a fundamental psychological mechanism, something which is like a loophole in the human brain that they are able to exploit.
I am a modest man, but surely, it is a rare thing that one is able to dissect these arguments in the way that I have done here on this site. It is my hope that others who are involved in this movement will continue to push this propaganda of truth against the lying Jewish doctrine of Libertarianism, as it has indeed infested our resistance – by way of Alex Jones, Ron Paul and the rest of the shills – to an astonishing degree.
And now, to the vanquishing of the enemy agent.
His words are in bold.
You can’t create wealth by fiat, Andre.
You want to smash capitalism as it currently exists? Great, so do we.
You absolutely can create wealth by fiat, that is just gibberish Jew talk.
Who are your “we”?
No. Proclamations and guns can only redistribute wealth, the creation of wealth requires toil in the conversion of matter into useful forms. Perhaps it is better to redistribute wealth by force, that is not my concern. The current redistribution sucks, and it is about as “free market” as Adolf Hitler was “Jewish.”
If you are asking about who I referred to as “we” above: libertarians; right, left, center, or not-on-the-map. William Godwin to Hans Herman Hoppe.
If you are asking who my “we” is in general: Whites who are intelligent and honest.
Yes, we should definitely try the Libertarian program for wealth creation – international free trade and the free movement of labor across national borders might just pull us out of this slump that was caused by “the government” putting all these restrictions on the “free market”! It makes perfect sense!
Sorry man, but your plan just isn’t working. And I know – there is some complicated reason why international free trade and open borders only led to the the crisis it has led to because of “the government,” and why globalization is only a universal exploitative race to the bottom because of certain technical oversights, as well as why our government is something other than a tool of international finance capitalism, but I’ve heard it and I am not impressed – it is all just more Jew gibberish, designed to rot out your brain and trick you into supporting things that are against your own interests and that of your people.
You are no doubt as tired of hearing about how fundamentally Jewish your theology is as I am of saying it, so I won’t again belabor the point.
I will note that a redistribution of wealth would be a very good step in the right direction, and this could be done through policy. There is massive wealth in America, it is just all held by Jews and other capitalists.
Right now, the only way to create wealth would be to shut off this free trade system that you promote. Instead of acknowledging that I’ve already said that, and coming up with a response to it, you instead pretend I didn’t say it and repeat again that libertarianism will somehow create wealth for White people in first world countries. This is like arguing with a Social Democrat in a Munich Beer Hall. If you have some counter-points to make, make them and I will respond, but don’t come on here after I’ve already debunked your cult and simply say “we need libertarianism” without even presenting an argument, it just makes you look like a hasbarat.
Explain how this Jewish cult doctrine of internationalism is even slightly compatible with racial nationalism, or stop evangelizing for it on my website.
I oppose international free trade, so go bark up another tree with that bullshit.
If you consider the US economy a “free market,” you are merely experiencing the myopia of the present day. FDR’s administration was paying farmers to destroy their crops so that market forces would increase the prices they could sell their remaining goods at – and FDR’s America was radically libertarian by today’s standards
Jews are the people of book-writing, they have their noses in every ideology. Racial nationalism, anyone?
Shutting down the flow of labor, capital, and consumables across international borders does not create wealth, it redistributes wealth to the proletariat and enterprenureate of our own political unit. I support it.
“repeat again that libertarianism will somehow create wealth for White people in first world countries.”
Where did I say that?
Oh, right. I didn’t. You’re just arguing with the voices in your head.
If you oppose international free trade, why do you call yourself a “libertarian”? International free trade is one of the prime tenets of that theology. Even those who have gone soft on their open-borders policy – saying that they need to abolish the government before opening up the borders to the hordes – still stick by the international free trade policy. Even Ron Paul supported it – and he is certainly a soft Libertarian.
So, I guess you have created your own version of “Libertarianism” which only you adhere to. That definitely makes it difficult to discuss.
As far as this No True Scotsman “not really free market, blah blah blah” – it is the same noise I hear from the communists about the Soviet Union – “not really true communist, blah blah blah.” The fact is that this is the way your free market system works – resources are centralized by a minority through the free trade system, and then those who have centralized the resources use the power they wield to organize a state apparatus that reinforces that power.
It is exceedingly depressing that I must continue to repeat such simple things to what I presume are grown adults. A child could understand this. An open market demands resource centralization, given that the allocation of resources is based on the capacity of an entity to produce a profit, and the capacity to produce a profit is based on the scale of the operation which is in turn based on amount of resources possessed (this last bit is due to a multitude of glaringly obvious factors that tend to escape the ideological libertarian – these include standardization and the efficiency of production systems which require a large-scale investment; a shoe factory costs thousands of times more to build than a cobbler shop, but produces thousands of times more efficiently).
And yes, the Jews are racially nationalist. They also use electricity, sleep in beds and have two eyes and a nose on their faces. Racial nationalism is a basic protection mechanism for any people. The fact that the Jews are racially nationalist does not somehow mean that racial nationalism is a Jewish concept. It is a natural state, a biological response to the modern world of nation-states. Libertarianism, on the other hand, is an idiotic ideological abstraction which has repeatedly been shown to be absolutely nonviable, and which was created entirely by Jews. There is no analog in the natural world to individualism, or the individual caring first for his own needs above all others. It is alien and unnatural, and only a Jew could have thought it up.
As to the witty remark at the end there – you said:
1. You want to smash “smash capitalism as it currently exists” because it doesn’t create wealth
2. You are a Libertarian
3. You are White
Forgive me for inferring that you were saying that Libertarianism would “create wealth for White people in first world countries.” I am deeply sorry if I have put words in your mouth. Frankly though sir, I have zero interest in playing word games with you. If you are promoting Libertarianism for some other reason than that you think it would be economically helpful to White nations, but yet do not feel a need to tell us what that reason is – perhaps it is a secret – then please, go away from here. I am sure you can find fertile ground to spread this gibberish on one of the “patriot” sites where people enjoy confusing themselves with nonsense. Here at Total Fascism, we are about real solutions to real problems, and we do not have time for endless circular arguments with Jewish propagandists or the victims of Jewish propaganda.
Surely, nothing could describe this troll better than “slimy ooze which slips through your fingers.” He says he is a Libertarian, and then when I attack a core principle of this doctrine, he claims he is a different, new type of Libertarian who doesn’t believe in the core tenets of the philosophy. Note that this is after he has cited Hans Herman Hoppe (who he cited with Godwin, no doubt because these two are among the only gentiles involved in this movement) as representative of the doctrine he supports, and Hoppe is a fanatical supporter of unrestricted free trade. I am not aware of a single prominent Libertarian who does not support international free trade – the trolls here in the Total Fascism comments section appear to have invented their own new version of the hoax. And again, this is not some peripheral aspect of the doctrine, it is a core concept – saying “I’m a Libertarian, but I don’t believe in international free trade” would be like saying “I am a Fascist, but I believe in international free trade.” It is ridiculous, but this can just slip through – when he is confronted, suddenly his ideology morphs into something completely different.
Once again: he then actually goes so far as to claim that I am delusional for assuming that he is promoting this doctrine because he believes it will be economically beneficial, implying that he is promoting it for some other reason, which he is apparently unwilling to share – surely if he were willing to share it, he would have done so immediately after dismissing my “baseless assertion” that he was promoting this economic doctrine because he felt it would be good for the economy.
The most important thing to note here is that this troll does as these Jew fiends all do, ceaselessly: he brings up arguments that have already been thoroughly dismissed as defying the most basic forms of logic as if they were unquestionable truths. It cannot ever be laid to rest with these people – once you prove them wrong, they just wait and come back later to say the same things over again.
Spread the Word
All of the old guard “truthers” and even many White Nationalists are still promoting this Jewish scam. I hope that people will go out and tell the truth about this hoax, as once it collapses, the entire false resistance movement led by Alex Jones and the rest of the patriot parrots will collapse with it. They have put everything into this ridiculous scam, and if we can expose it for the unnatural, illogical, elitist hoax that it is, we will gain a lot of ground in our fight to dictate the narrative.
As I’ve demonstrated here, we have the truth on our side. The solution to our economic woes is Total Fascism. By way of authoritarian socialism, we will crush the abusive capitalist system, and return the people’s labor to them. We represent hard justice and fierce action, whereas those in the old “conservative” movement represent a lot of hollow and confusing gibberish and a botched-out scheme to bring back a dead system from a long gone era that never even worked in the first place.
All that is left is for our people in the resistance movement to hear the truth, and they shall flock to us.