French Magazine Calls Black Minister a Monkey

"Taubira gets her banana back."

“Taubira gets her banana back.”

The ‘far right’ French magazine, Minute, today featured a cover featuring France’s black minister Christiane Taubira, with headlines reading ‘crafty as a monkey’ and ‘Taubira gets her banana back.’

Apparently, both of these are common French expressions. ‘Crafty as a monkey’ is similar to the English ‘sly as a fox,’ and ‘getting your banana back’ can be compared to ‘getting back in the groove.’ It is, however, quite clear that the magazine, which has a distribution of 40,000, was calling this black minister a banana-eating monkey.

Taubira is hated by conservative French not simply for representing the conquest of their nation by invading hordes of nonwhite savages, but also for her intensely liberal policy. She is personally credited with pushing through the gay marriage law, which the majority of French are opposed to (they put up more of a fight against homosexual civil union than any other Western country, including the US).

Christiane Taubira: She's into immigration, gay sex and bananas.

Christiane Taubira: She’s into immigration, gay sex and bananas.

In the last weeks, she has been repeatedly called a banana-eating monkey by French people.

At an anti-gay marriage demonstration last month, children were filmed chanting “monkey, eat your banana.”

Shortly before this, Anne-Sophie Leclere, a mayoral candidate running on the Front National ticket, posted on Facebook calling her a monkey and saying she would “rather see her in the trees than in the government.”

Front National candidate Anne Sophie Leclere posted pictures comparing the black minister to a monkey, including this one which shows Taubira "at 18 months" and "now."

Front National candidate Anne Sophie Leclere posted pictures comparing the black minister to a monkey, including this one which shows Taubira “at 18 months” and “now.”

Disgustingly, the traitorous Marine Le Pen suspended her from the party for these statements.

To Call Blacks Monkeys or Not to Call Blacks Monkeys

This monkey business brings up the oft-debated question of whether or not degrading racial stereotypes should be used as a weapon by traditionalist forces seeking to delegitimize the invading hordes by tearing down their protective wall of political correctness directly.

It is very important that we are able to successfully propagandize the masses to understand just how fundamentally idiotic and insane it is to treat black Africans, and other nonwhites, as equal to us, and worthy of participating in our society, and I believe that humor is of key importance in this operation.

Italy's black minister, Cecile Kyenge, is regularly called a monkey and often has bananas thrown at her by angry Italians who do not wish to be a colony of Africa.

Italy’s black minister, Cecile Kyenge, is regularly called a monkey and often has bananas thrown at her by angry Italians who do not wish to be a colony of Africa.

Though I am opposed to excessive use of the word ‘nigger,’ given that it tends to sound overly hateful, due to the political and cultural baggage attached to it, calling blacks monkeys as a way to make them look simply silly perhaps has more strategic worth.

It seems that it can work well with certain segments of the masses in Europe, and could have wider appeal if it was repeated enough. Clearly, when looking at blacks, the immediate and natural reaction is to note the striking similarity to simian mammals. This is intrinsically funny, on a very basic level, especially when you are talking about these people running governments or having sex with White women. If used correctly, especially in conjunction with comments about bananas and/or swinging from trees, it is too funny to come across as overtly hateful or bitter.

It has already been scientifically proven that Whites naturally associate the appearance of blacks with that of apes. Tapping into this, distasteful as it may seem to those intellectuals among us, may well serve our propaganda purposes. It seems that it is emerging naturally anyway, as the invading hordes become more hostile, and the White race increasingly resorts to instinctive psychological defense mechanisms.

What does the reader think?

This entry was posted in Europe, Propaganda, Psychology, Race, Racialism and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

37 Responses to French Magazine Calls Black Minister a Monkey

  1. Phil says:

    (Sorry for the screwed-up formatting. Correction below.)

    “The ruling had made it clear Mr Guerlain was not making a joke and that racism is not an opinion but a crime.”

    So-called “racism” has never been, nor is, nor will ever be considered a “crime” in the minds of normal human beings. What is a “crime” is the unwanted Jewish thought and speech control laws and Jewish domination over us in virtually every aspect of our lives (that is a fact), is a CRIME and not what Jewish supremacist control freaks like the Jewess above define as “racist” or “racism.”

    I’ll tell you this: if ever the dam breaks, so to speak, these miserable Jews will not believe (nor escape) the firestorm of pent-up anger, fury and years of bottled-up righteous indignation within the masses of people wise to them. All the “hate crime” laws they are responsible for writing, in reality thought and speech control laws as exemplified above, and lobbied into law, will not save their miserable, domineering, overbearing asses one bit.

    Enough is enough!


  2. Wilson Mount says:

    I’ve always referred to them as ‘shaved gorillas’.

    • rabbi Ishmael says:

      This is to all my haters that said we Jews wouldnt make it. Im black bitches. Go back to Mississippi mutha fuckas

      MMG nigga, chain all VS
      I ain’t with the BS
      Catch me in the city riding hard through the BX
      Skinny nigga, but I do it large like a 3X
      The last nigga that tried to do me wrong, uhm he checked
      Right back to that money slinging Os in the Pjects
      I’m prolly catching milage while the pilot steer the P-jet
      Because we next and we flex like…

      [Big Sean]
      Like 90PX, working all night
      No breaks or recess
      Vroom, Vroom
      Yeah, I know my car sound like a T-Rex
      Bitch I’m 23 years old and I ain’t riding in a Prius
      My cousin finished school
      Can’t believe he graduated
      I threw him 20 thousand dollars
      Told his ass congratulations
      Cause me, I wasn’t made for that shit
      But I could prolly hire him and who all paid for his shit
      And to all the hoes that was dissing, I pray to god that you see me
      I’m on the yacht getting hella high, smoking good, that seaweed
      Bad bitch and her chacha, grabbing on her chi chi’s
      Million dollars bills on my email
      You mad ass hell you ain’t CC’d
      Chain all VS
      Bitch you know its BS
      Boy I run my city

      [Meek Mill]
      End of story, Nigga PS
      All white maybach
      Green Bay they pack
      Y’all niggas was slackin
      Remember the hard nights of me trappin
      And they say life’s a game of chess
      You can play checkers all on my jacket
      Because it Donny Ya and rhymes away on all you pig rappers
      I say yeah nigga I murder that
      Pen em ear and serve em back
      Niggas say they want beef
      Well well the fucks my burgers at
      I got white, was serving that
      I been to jail, Ain’t going back
      I alley-ooped your bitch off that backboard
      She throw it back
      I slammed dunk in that pussy
      Blake Griffin’d your hoe nigga
      Maybach with Ricky Ross my chain rock like I know Jigga
      That’s cause I do hoe
      Shout out to my new hoe
      That pussy pink like Nuvo
      And I dogged that, Khujo

      [Big Sean]
      Niggas want talk
      What they gone say
      I hit the pedal til that muthafucka break
      Freaky bitches love the money I make
      And to live like this
      You muthafuckas gotta pay
      So let that shit burn
      Let that shit burn
      Let that shit burn
      Let that shit burn
      The roof on fire, I’m only gettin’ higher
      50 racks all in my pocket, all the bottles
      I’ma let that shit burn

      [Big Sean]
      Bitch, I had one shot and ain’t blow it
      Ridin’ til the wheels fell off and they tore it
      I got green on top of green
      Damn it’s lookin’ like I grew it
      D-Town, The hood behind me like a King Cobra

      [Meek Mill]
      Burn, Bitch
      I let it burn bitch
      My money straighta than a motherfuckin’ perm bitch
      No navigation, you can see that is my turn shit
      Shorty give me all that brain and still ain’t never learn shit

      [Big Sean]
      Oh that’s your girl,
      Damn nigga you ain’t learn shit
      She naked in my studio
      I’m on that Howard Stern Shit
      Yep, I swear that Mack 10 is barbell
      Finally famous, the cartel
      Hit your girl in my whip and now that pussy got that new car smell
      Same shit, different day
      I ain’t broke no more, it’s a different day
      Don’t turn me down, I got shit to say
      My purp strong like it’s lifting weights
      It Sean Don, sippin’ Chandon I got a bad bitch with them pom poms
      My rolly don’t tick tock, you shit sound like a time bomb
      Little Bitch…

      [Big Sean]
      Niggas want talk
      What they gone say
      I hit the pedal til that muthafucka break
      Freaky bitches love the money I make
      And to live like this
      You muthafuckas gotta pay
      So let that shit burn

      [Meek Mill]
      Let that shit burn
      Let that shit burn
      Let that shit burn
      The roof on fire, I’m only gettin’ higher
      50 racks all in my pocket, all the bottles
      I’ma let that shit burn

      [Meek Mill]
      Niggas want talk
      What they gone say
      I hit the pedal til that muthafucka break
      Freaky bitches love the money i make
      And to live like this
      You muthafuckas gotta pay
      So let that shit burn
      Let that shit burn
      Let that shit burn
      Let that shit burn
      The roof on fire, I’m only gettin’ higher
      50 racks all in my pocket, all the bottles
      I’ma let that shit burn…burn

  3. DaveMansfield says:

    Great job Julian. Let me just say one thing…Who gives a fuck what Anonymous says over at his site. He did a great thing, he broke the Hitler silence (from what I understood at the time) and now he wants to abandon these principles that WORKED.

    My impression is that he views things in a, SO AND SO should have had X-ray vision ability to predict the future and what an idiot SO AND SO is for not having everything work out. Didn’t SO AND SO know that the Jews would do such and such and such and such.

    Adolf Hitler was a real guy who lived and breathed and had victories and failures. My advice to anybody who does not understand that, go outside, give a couple hundred speeches to the indoctrinated masses and try to attain power. Hitler did that, it was not easy, but he did, and he came within inches of saving the world.

    I for one am not really interested in what the non white movement says anymore. We have to forget these people. I wish them the best in their quest in opposing Zionism and their specialty which is focusing on the Israel/Palestine issue. I live in America, and America is being destroyed. So if we had to send every Jew to Israel to save America, I would do it in a second.

  4. Julian says:

    ZCF responded, so here is my response back:

    Why do I condemn Judaism but not Nazism?

    Because using the gun analogy again, I don’t want to go around shooting people, but if someone is trying to shoot me, I need to grab a gun and defend myself. If Judaism never existed in the political context that Hitler understood it, then Nazism would really not need to exist. Hitler was proud to fight for Germany in Wold War 1 and did not need to be Fuhrer or even create a Social democracy if it was not absolutely needed. But because of the racial policies of the Zionists and Marxists, the nations of Italy and Germany stood up against this crushing totalitarian system, and you wonder why I would praise them while condemning Zionism? Because the Nazis were the good guys of World War 2, sorry to be so simplistic about it, but it’s really true, and it is no different than believing the allies were the good guys, which is established mainstream history. So if anyone is trying to copy someone else, it’s the West copying Nazism! Operation paperclip alone sums this up, but I can go on:

    Why do people still love the VW Beetle?
    Why is Hollywood (which is mainly run by Jews) obsessed with blonde hair, blue eyed, Aryan, German women?
    Why if Hitler and the Nazis were so evil, did the American military fall over themselves picking up their scientists?
    Why if Hitler is such an imitation of Judaism, didn’t the Americans come up with the stealth fighter before Hitler did?
    Why is it that the Nazis were able to excel at automotive engineering marvels such as Formula 1 racing as well as create roads such as the Autobahn that are still used today?

    If, after all, Nazis are just imitating the Jews! That’s laughable.

    Why do I condemn one and not the other? Because one is essentially dead and wiped off the face of the earth, while the other is still controlling us as of this day!

    How can you NOT praise one while condemning the other? The funny thing is YOU, yes YOU ZCF introduced me to the brighter side of Nazism, now you are condemning them!? Just crazy.

    Nazism is based on communism but designed to destroy communism; that is the main difference between the two. And thank you for admitting that Herzl could not have even been talking about the Nazis. So, that proves that that quote does not really apply to the Nazis at all. The Nazis were never considered “allies” so using antisemites to their advantage meant using Russian anti-semitism which did exist in small numbers as propaganda to create a common enemy. This is smart tactics by the Jews, and they deserve credit for this, but to just say, “Well they want us to fight back, so we’ll not fight back” is cowardice, because ultimately, as I said before, THE JEWS DO NOT WANT A RESPECTABLE ANTISEMITIC GROUP. If this were remotely possible, then Golden Dawn would not be facing false charges.

    I’ll admit that the widespread re-location of Jews all across Europe was a foolish policy, as Hitler should have focused on Germany and Austria where his major support existed, but it should also be noted that according to mainstream holocaust historians, Himmler was considered the one fully in charge of “The Holocaust” and so if he controlled things on the ground, it could have been his policy working to collect as many Jews as possible. Hitler’s main focus was on winning the war and the Jews were a small statistical part of this. The holocaust goes so far as to say that Hitler rounded up all the Jews in Poland and murdered them. What was more truthful is the Nazis captured millions of people as prisoners of war (which the allies were also doing), and many of them happened to be Jews. Also, according to Nazi ideology and Hitler’s main beliefs, the Jews were instrumental in destroying European society, so the only thing you can really criticise the Nazis for is not actually having a holocaust! But of course, now THAT would be hypocrisy, because we ultimately condemn Judaism/Zionism for its brutality and murder. 9/11, 3000 dead, various false flags in America such as the Boston Bombing and these MKULTRA type shooter scenarios, many of them having Israeli ties all over them, that is the problem. The Nazis are not killing random people all over America, unless you believe Alex Jones. So, if we did call for the execution of Jews, THAT would be hypocrisy, but we are not. Relocation and separation IS the answer, which is what Hitler wanted, but the mainstream covers this up with “execution horror stories” which does mimic what Herzl was talking about as using Nazi propaganda as a means of scaring their sheep. Regardless, that does not mean it is true, it is propaganda and so it is false, all the more reason to see the Nazis as the heroes.

    In Mein Kampf, Hitler clearly calls out both the Jews and Zionists as enemies. And since the transfer agreement was nothing secret, it meant that it was an open agreement, not a conspiracy, and the political reality was that Nazis and Zionists did have one foreign policy agreement, and it is actually quite worthy that they agreed on this issue. Because Zionists essentially want to be one nation. Nazis want to be one nation. That is racial separation. You wrongly see this as a “conspiracy” or something negative, but it is not. The truth is that Jews in America and England did not want this, and they ended the transfer agreement by starting World War 2. If the transfer agreement was so great, wouldn’t it be easier to do this during peace time and not war time? And if the war was the propaganda to egg it on, then Hitler stopping it in 1939 was actually a good idea. So you see, it’s not really that bad, it’s actually a good thing. The Jews in the West wanted to set up Israel as a criminal haven, which Hitler clarifies in Mein Kampf. They were the ones that started the war which ended the agreement, because ultimately the Jews pretend to be marxists but secretly help the Zionists be a racial state. This is the conspiracy, the Jews and Zionists working together, not the Jews and (dead) Nazis. Zionists are religious/racist extremists, which is fine with me so long as they stay the hell away from me. But the Jews in America and Europe push Marxism, feminism, affirmative action, homosexuality, they hate the white race and try and destroy the foundations of its culture, while elevating black culture, and Jewish culture, while never condemning Israel. Why is it that the Democrats never condemn Israel? Because it is a conspiracy. The Nazis wanted a racially pure nation and yes they tried to exterminate or at least relocate most of Europe, but Judaism does this with the world, while also allowing for one racially pure state, Israel.

    The Nazis were allied with Japan, which says a lot about their racial agenda. So long as the country had a demographic border from them, they had no problem with them so long as they shared some ideological points. Hitler even liked the Muslims for crying out loud! Hitler was not a white supremacist like the idiot mainstream media claims. If you were not a raving lunatic mass murderer, Hitler did not have a problem with you, otherwise they would have viewed Japan as inferior racially, which of course they did not. Hitler praises Japanese culture in fact. The Italians also were quite different from the Nazis but Hitler idolized Mussolini, so that shows that Nazism was more than just race. And where the Jews acted rationally, they even made diplomacy with the Nazis. But the allies of America, England, and Russia, never acted diplomatically, the murderous streak of Soviet Russia could not be forgiven and Hitler had reason to believe they would strike first, and England was a complete pawn of the Jews, while Hitler grieved that America was swept up in this because they had such a high number of German blood in America. So the real hypocrite of World War 2 was Churchhill and England, which in Hitler’s own words, destroyed the British empire all because of the dreams of the Jews. The British created Israel, not Hitler. Amazing how we are wasting time arguing about Hitler being a Zionist shill when England and America were clearly the bigger shills.

    Finally you once again blame Hitler and not the Allies for being involved in the Middle East wars. If Israel was never created there would still be wars, case in point World War 1, and the Korean/Vietnam/Cold wars were based on Communism (is that Hitler’s fault too?) and the wars of the 1800′s that established a central banking control of America and divided the nation during the Civil War. You can’t blame everything today on Hitler, that is ridiculous. Hitler ended the transfer agreement in 1939, or it ended regardless of who ended it, so to condemn him for the transfer agreement means you also have to praise him for ending it! And since both encompassed six years, that’s about even. And so what should Hitler have done? Nothing? That is cowardice. Something else? That may not be humane. So if the Nazis never existed, the Communists would be the big bad boogie man, or the Muslims. Picking one of the Jew’s enemies and saying, they are the cause of all the problems today, when clearly that is not the case, is just delusional. Especially picking the Nazis who are the only ones seeking to destroy the true enemy of humanity. The (moderate) muslims would rather convert the Jews or just live in peace, and their religion is similar to Judaism. I personally am not a Christian so I can only criticize Hitler’s Christianity, however, Christianity did represent traditional values which was being threatened by the Marxist masses, Hitler himself desribed Christianity as a necessary evil “spiritual terror” and that is a bit extreme for my tastes, but that is a purely theocratical position and the actual efforts Hitler took does not warrant condemnation but rather awe and inspiration. The only tragedy is he lost, but if he won then you might have an argument to stand on that it’s all “his fault.”

    Hitler believed that a dictator should take full responsibility for his actions, and so when he failed, he committed suicide (Hari Kari, essentially), this is not something anyone can take lightly but it shows that he was willing to do what no politician today does, take responsibility for his actions. A man who was defiant until the end, not even wanting his body to be desecrated by the Jews (or who escaped…who knows), so regardless, it’s tragic he lost, but you can’t blame things today on his death or his after death.

    Honestly the only thing I blame Hitler for is losing, so if Hitler was controlled opposition, then why wage war against him in the first place? I see Russia, Iran, and even North Korea as controlled opposition, paper tigers that don’t do anything but can be used for political scare mongering. Hitler actually fought back, so if he was controlled opposition, he came the closest to actually being too successful of controlled opposition. So what is your course of action? You already made it clear that you are not a leader but a writer, so should we all just write about our problems and never try to actually solve them politically? A guy like Ron Paul can’t even get the media’s acknowledgement that he is actually running for president, while Hitler became the dictator of Germany! And the events were similar to today, the Jews in control of the political power in Germany following World War 1. It was actually worse because of the Versailles Treaty. So if the average American has no hope of getting through the AIPAC battleground, doesn’t it say something of the heroism that Hilter had in leading his nation, if only for a decade or so, out of a terrible execution? Just because he lost does not mean he was controlled opposition. Controlled opposition is someone like Soviet Communism undergoing an entire Cold War with America without firing a single bullet yet both sides make billions of war funds ready due to the “threat” of the opposite side. The Nazis were an actual threat, so they were actual opposition, not controlled opposition.

    • Ben G says:

      It might not be worthwhile to engage with ZCF on his hate site at this point.

    • Steven Rowlandson says:

      National Socialism is all about what is good for the nation and its founding race.
      It is not about what is good for demoncracy, jewish bolshevism and a new world order presided over by satanists, homosexuals, mafias, jews, masons, banksters, political gangsters and foriegners.

    • Phil says:

      Well said. My only disagreement is with your constant use of “Nazism” and “Nazis”. Adolph Hitler and other National Socialists did not refer to themselves as “Nazis” or their movement “Nazism”. That is a derogatory word, a slur, an epithet coined by a greasy Jew named Conrad Heiden, a marxist, a liar, a propagandist with a poison pen, just one of many Jews very hostile to National Socialism.

      It’s time to debunk the “Nazi” epithet, and to show you where it came from, who invented it, and why. The fact is, that the term “Nazi” was created by the enemies of the National Socialists (the NSDAP). It was a pejorative term; an insult or a slur. The Germans, not even Hitler nor any other top party officials ever called themselves “Nazis”! They called themselves “National Socialists” and nothing else. Those who can read German and have studied any of the original documents and speeches know this already, but most don’t.

      “The term “Nazi” (along with “Nazism”) is a political epithet invented by Konrad Heiden (7 August 1901 – 18 June 1966) during the 1920s as a means of denigrating the NSDAP and National Socialism. Heiden was a journalist and member of the Social Democratic Party. The term is a variant of the nickname that was used in reference to members of the SDP at the time “Sozi” (short for Sozialisten). “Nazi” was a political pun, based upon the Austro-Bavarian slang word for “simpleton” or “country bumpkin”, and derived from the fairly common name Ignatz. It would be like saying “nutsy”. So, if for no other reason, one should easily understand why the term was regarded as derogatory by the National Socialists and why they would never use it to describe themselves. One should also see why it would be used and popularized by Marxist-Bolshevik agitators and understand how it was seized upon by various other political opponents and subversive types, both within Germany and abroad, including the international media and political leaders of the western powers.”

      read the rest of the article here:

    • Phil says:

      “Nazism is based on communism but designed to destroy communism; that is the main difference between the two.”

      Whoa! Hold on there! “Nazism” is based on communism? Are you kidding me? That is so far removed from reality! But you are correct that they were out to destroy (rightly so) Jewish communism, the most evil, repressive, terrorizing tyranny ever imposed on mankind resulting in the deaths and murders of over one-hundred million souls last century in eastern Europe, the Far East, Africa and other places where this Jewish cancer was introduced.


  5. Sandy says:

    I think that humans in general look like some animals . Some have long face who look like a horse, others look like cats especially women. Some whites look like apes or pigs especially pinky faces men:). Therefore not only blacks who look like monkeys. You should thank god if he made you look better than others.

  6. Julian says:

    ZCF has a real interesting article everyone needs to check out:

    Here is my rebuttal to him:

    Just because Nazism resembles Judaism does not mean it is the same thing, with the notable difference being it was meant to destroy the Jews not become them. In Mein Kampf Hitler admits to Nazism being based off of Communism, especially using the color red to attract the crowds, but this doesn’t mean Nazism is communism because Nazism sought to destroy Communism! This is like saying, America and British use a gun, so any country that uses a gun is like the West, and more importantly IS the west, isn’t that what this Rabbi’s quote and your inference is saying? Saying it’s an “imitation”? But that does not mean it has the same goals.

    Then you quote Herzl, so, question, are the Nazis the “respectable, accredited anti-semites? Their most “dependable friends and allies?” Clearly, Herzl is taking about other anti-semites, not the Nazis, as the Nazis were never viewed as dependable friends and allies. The veiled argument which isn’t even clearly said here is that the Nazis are so extreme that they benefit the Jews somehow. Even if this were true in the past, how is it an argument to stay away from Nazism or the ideology of White Nationalism which is the true evolution of Nazism? So the only benefit the Jews get from Nazism is in Hollywood movies, and there is no way that Jews would vote to have a “respectable, antisemitic” group in the media today. If they wanted one, they could have one. Instead, they seek to destroy them all.

    You reference the transfer agreement as if it were a bad thing, when it REMOVED JEWS FROM EUROPE. It also showed that Hitler was willing to work with Jews on a diplomatic level and that Zionists and Nazis did have one thing in common: THE REMOVAL OF JEWS FROM EUROPE. This unfortunately is taken by conspiracy theorists as “Hitler is a Zionist,” but this is clearly wrong and I don’t need to explain this to you why it is.

    Again, why does it matter if it benefits the Jews if it also benefits the Nazis? That is a normal positive agreement, and so Hitler would be a fool not to have taken it. Unless of course you are blaming Israel’s genocide against Palestine as somehow Hiter’s fault, which is laughable and not to be gone into. The bottom line is that Hitler as the “father of Israel” is doing the world a favor by getting them out of Europe and into the middle of the desert. Not too shabby.

    • Ken says:

      The Jew loving Koch Family helped start the John Birch Society (How many times do we have to see deceivers lead an organization to control the opposition?).

      Hitler was a Zionist, since a Zionist is one who believes Kikes should have their own homeland (I am still looking for 1 Jew Banker that Hitler imprisoned or put to death for their crimes).

      I am still wondering where Hitler’s body is? (Maybe with Bin Laden’s missing body?)

      There are German “Nazis” from WWII now living in Israel as citizens (we all know the qualifications for Israeli citizenship).

      Why does Tora Bora appear so much like Dunkirk? (letting your supposed enemy go? We all know today that AlQaeda is CIA/Mossad…….)

      Ironic how Hitler was ordered by the Jew Military to infiltrate the German Worker’s Party as a spy (then he takes it over? LOL).

      The real reason the Jew does not want people to investigate WWII/Nazis/Holocaust may be far different than most realize.

      • Julian says:

        Hitler imprisoned a Rothschild, so I’d say he imprisoned the TOP banker. He shut down Rothschild banks in Germany, Austria, and France.

        • Ken says:

          Hitler imprisoned “a Rothschild” you claim (without any evidence)? Why can’t you actually NAME this “Rothschild”?

          From all my research/reading, Hitler did not want to harm the hair on any Jew and was very upset about the Night of Broken Glass, according to his man-servant Heinz Linge. (In my opinion, this is because his Masters did not want any Jews harmed, they just wanted more emotional vitriolic to control the opposition yet keep Jews safe for their future agenda of gathering Jews together to form Israel).

          How do people honestly believe that some poor little skinny short enlisted man who was a spy for the Jew controlled German Army then becomes “Chancellor” of Germany? Truly is an amazing story, even more amazing that some people actually fall for it; then again, poor little skinny Obama is was created and elected because of his merits as well….. Democracy is a JOKE, whether its in Germany or USA. Monarchs and Dictators rule based on merit, DEMOCRATICALLY elected puppets are PUPPETS and nothing more.

          • Andrew Anglin says:

            This is the first time you asked for the name, Ken. Most people who study these issues are already aware that Baron Louis Nathaniel de Rothschild was imprisoned, while the rest of the family escaped, as they would have been imprisoned as well as in 1938.

            You are arguing that the Jews wanted to be rounded up and put in camps, Ken?

            If the plan was to be gathered in Israel, why didn’t they just go when Hitler was offering them financial support to do so? What would be the purpose of starting a war where at least several hundred thousands of Jews died, if the goal was to go to Israel. Hitler was offering them more than all of their property was worth and letting them leave with all of their gold if they would just go to Palestine.

            Of course he was upset about the night of broken glass. It was bad publicity for the international theater. What is the purpose of assuming a secret mystery, when there are obvious self explanatory answers for events?

            I know it probably hurts the ego to have to admit you were duped, Ken, but it’s about time you moved on. Unless of course you have some purpose in continuing to push these lies using logic like “how could a man be voted for? It doesn’t make sense. There must be a secret mystery.”

            Or maybe you could start your own website, trying to convince people that Hitler was secretly working for the Jews, and see how popular it gets. It probably would have been very popular three years ago, but now the truth is out, and you can’t shove it back in the bag.

            • Rabbi Ishmael says:

              Bound to fall in love
              Bound to fall in love
              (Uh-huh, honey)

              All them other niggas lame, and you know it now
              When a real nigga hold you down, you supposed to drown


              What you doing in the club on a Thursday?
              She say she only here for her girl birthday
              They ordered champagne but still look thirsty
              Rock Forever 21 but just turned thirty
              I know I got a bad reputation
              Walking-’round-always-mad reputation
              Leave-a-pretty-girl-sad reputation
              Start a Fight Club, Brad reputation
              I turnt the nightclub out of the basement
              I’ll turn the plane ’round, your ass keep complaining
              How you gon’ be mad on vacation?
              Dutty wining ’round all these Jamaicans
              Uh, this that prom shit
              This that what-we-do-don’t-tell-your-mom shit
              This that red-cup-all-on-the-lawn shit
              Got a fresh cut, straight out the salon, bitch

              [Bridge: Charlie Wilson]
              I know you’re tired of loving, of loving
              With nobody to love, nobody, nobody (Uh-huh, honey)

              [Bridge: Kanye West]
              Close your eyes and let the word paint a thousand pictures
              One good girl is worth a thousand bitches


              [Verse 2: Kanye West]
              I wanna fuck you hard on the sink
              After that, give you something to drink
              Step back, can’t get spunk on the mink
              I mean damn, what would Jeromey Romey Romey Rome think?
              Hey, you remember where we first met?
              Okay, I don’t remember where we first met
              But hey, admitting is the first step
              And hey, you know ain’t nobody perfect
              And I know, with the hoes I got the worst rep
              But hey, their backstroke I’m tryna perfect
              And hey, ayo, we made it: Thanksgiving
              So hey, maybe we can make it to Christmas
              She asked me what I wished for on my wishlist
              Have you ever asked your bitch for other bitches?
              Maybe we could still make it to the church steps
              But first, you gon’ remember how to forget
              After all these long-ass verses
              I’m tired, you tired, Jesus wept

              [Bridge: Charlie Wilson]
              I know you’re tired of loving, of loving
              With nobody to love, nobody, nobody
              Just grab somebody, no leaving this party
              With nobody to love, nobody, nobody (Uh-huh, honey)

              [Bridge: Kanye West]
              Jerome’s in the house, watch your mouth
              Jerome’s in the house, watch your mouth

        • Andrew Anglin says:

          Yeah, and he also put hundreds of thousands of Jews in concentration camps after stripping them of their wealth.

          The “Hitler was a secret Jew” theory is so worn out and silly, is like a novelty to see it popping up these days.

          As Ken says here, Hitler supported sending Jews to their own homeland, so why would the Jews start a war against him which resulted in mass numbers of their folk being rounded up and put in camps?

          No aspect of the theory makes sense, unless you are the sort that likes to believe crazy and irrational things because it excites you.

          I guess Ken doesn’t support the Jews having their own homeland, and would rather have them all in Europe.

          • Steven Rowlandson says:

            Andrew I think the jews should have their own country and I am not trying to be nice to the jews either. If all the jews were in Israel for example we could impose travel and trade restrictions on them. If they made trouble requiring a military response then as a nation they could be punished through war.
            The important point though is they would not be in white nations trying to hijack us from with in and making us all their political , financial and mental slaves. They have got to go!

        • Jamie says:

          Hitler was NOT Jewish did not work for Jews and was the greatest man of the 20th centery at least of all the people I know of. All this has been proven many different times in many places, at least to anyone that has common sence. Not 1 of their lies can be proven, all we do no is if Hilter and Germany would have won WW2, the world expecially the White race would be much better of living in country’s controlled by are people, ‘it is are homeland and has been defended for thousands of years by are ancestors against the Hoards of Aliens are tyranicle governments controlled by Jews no allow in to displace us. It’s to bad survival instinct has really started to kick in and we will win easly once everyone wakes up to the Genocide thats being done to us. The White race will win are freedom from these aliens and Jews and never allow them to do anything to us again or live among us well hating us for supporting them and building the worlds great civilisations.

          • Reconquista aut Requiem says:

            The Heinz Linge “theory” has also ran its course. As for the “real” ZCF the same, he sounds like a kike woman scorned, their noses out grow the plastic surgery! Pay them no attention and move onto things more important!

    • Phil says:

      If anything, it’s the Zionist Jews that mimicked and continue to mimic National Socialists and not the other way around. The only difference is, unlike Germany, Palestine belonged to the Palestinians not the Zionist interlopers from Europe, Russia, etc.


    • Rabbi Ishmael says:


  7. Steven Rowlandson says:

    Asia for the Asians, Israel for the Jews, Africa for the Africans and White countries for non semite White people. That is the natural order of things. Obey it.

  8. Clark Kaufman says:

    This text can say nigger because it’s black.

  9. Chloe Bradford says:

    As for the magazine, go back into it’s history… It has plenty of Jews. So, I’m not surprised by this stupid article. Why stupid? Well, we all came from guess who.

  10. Chloe Bradford says:

    I’m all for this. These blacks are drawing Swastika’s (Good) and knocking Jews out. Lol.

  11. Matt says:

    Monkey is too ambiguous. In the childishly sensitive climate of political correctness most people are quick to make the connection, but they will demand an explanation why you called a black guy a monkey, just to make sure you really are racist. Explanations make you look weak.

    Nigger on the other hand is very blunt and to the point. No one misunderstands it. It’s a perfect term of slur for the jungle-dwelling, subhuman monkeys which will just not get off our backs.

    Nigger all the way.


    • Radolf says:

      Monkey is good for ridicule. Kikes place niggers in positions of prestige and authority so people take niggers seriously and see them as human, drawing Obama as an ape accompanied with a monkey joke is effective. It tears up the aurora of authority that the nigger is supposed to have, the image the jew wants to broadcast. The magazine above is a good example of this.

  12. Radolf says:

    Good question, both nigger and monkeys are good. Monkeys is better when used for mocking and making clever jokes, good for headlines. Nigger is more appropriate for commentary on typical but shocking black primal behavior such as Detroit, bankrupting the city, crime, chimping out, cannibal episodes, running wild and naked in public places, etc…
    The word nigger re-enforces and feeds of the primal situation being discussed.

    Here is an example of I mean taken from one of Eric Thomson letters:
    “After seeing photos of bombed out cities in history books and magazines, I was surprised and shocked to see similar sights in American cities. “Was there an air raid?’ I asked the bus driver when we arrived in Buffalo, NY. He said, no, and a passenger muttered: “Niggers.” Once again, we see similar results from different causes.”

  13. Chris White says:

    In the UK saying the word “nigger” on the street (even in casual private conversation), is actually a criminal offence. Whites have actually been arrested and disproportionately man-handled by psychologically conditioned police officers for doing so.

    Not so long ago the French perfume magnet Jean-Paul Guerlain was actually put on trial fined 8,000 euros simply for using the phrase “I set to work like a negro” on a French television program. The maximum penalty for doing that in France is a 26,000 euro fine and a custodial sentence.

    Here in this Telegraph article the grotesque Jewess Sabrina Goldman proclaims: “The ruling had made it clear Mr Guerlain was not making a joke and that racism is not an opinion but a crime.”

    So basically the kikes are letting us known that according to them, we don’t own our own vocal cords and that to use them in any way we see fit to express opinions they disapprove of is a crime. – This is basically tantamount to saying that they own our own bodies, as if we were slaves, but who is The Jew to attempt to enslave great nations such as France or England? What has The Jew actually given to the World except superstition, insult, sacrilege and fraud?

    To give in to this direct and insidious attempt to pervert our language in order to control our thoughts and ideas is a form of intellectual treason and must be opposed at on every front, not matter how crude the methods readily available at any one time may seem.

    In this age of Orwellian New Speak it is essential to deprive the enemy of the use and definition of language and of their control over those able to speak it and since the word “nigger” is deemed to be one of the most blasphemous of all, it is therefore vital that we use it as often as possible just as we deny their shoah (demand for guilt), as often as possible.

    This is a very good analysis of exactly why it is extremely important to keep forbidden words like “nigger” in the subjective hands of ordinary White People:

    • Chloe Bradford says:

      Actually the Australian Aborigine is the only “Human” that’s not actually Human. They are Homo Sapiens, but not Homo Sapiens Sapiens like the rest of the modern world.

      I don’t think it matters much, it’s not like they’re going rise up with super-fantastic military technology or anything.

      • T . Abbey says:

        Haha that’s for sure! Boomerang space ship una! Woulda had if tha white fella didn’t come :) Take the piss I say call them monkeys/apes, even though if defames those cool little creatures. Gibbon > Nig

    • Phil says:

      “The ruling had made it clear Mr Guerlain was not making a joke and that racism is not an opinion but a crime.”</i"

      So-called "racism" has never been, nor is, nor will ever be considered a “crime” in the minds of normal human beings. What is a “crime” is the unwanted Jewish thought and speech control laws and Jewish domination over us in virtually every aspect of our lives (that is a fact), is a CRIME and
      not what Jewish supremacist control freaks like the Jewess above define as “racist” or “racism.”

      I’ll tell you this: if ever the dam breaks, so to speak, these miserable Jews will not believe (nor escape) the firestorm of pent-up anger, fury and years of bottled-up righteous indignation within the masses of people wise to them. All the “hate crime” laws they are responsible for writing, in reality thought and speech control laws as exemplified above, and lobbied into law, will not save their miserable, domineering, overbearing asses one bit.

      Enough is enough!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>