Feminism: A Jewish War on Femininity

Through Feminism, the Jew attacks the core, primal identity of the female, weakening society by disallowing women to be who and what they are: caregivers.

Through Feminism, the Jew attacks the core, primal identity of the female, weakening society by disallowing women to be who and what they are: caregivers.

Though critics often frame feminism as an attack on males and masculinity, I assert that it is very much a direct attack on femininity and the female identity.  The very core nature of the human female has been obscured and vilified by the Jews who conceived and led this movement, and this has been one of the largest factors contributing to the fallout of Western civilization.  In order to restore natural law to society, the female will have to be strengthened, and the only possible way to do this is to reestablish the feminine identity by dissolving the Jewish doctrine of feminism.

The premise of feminism is that females had been oppressed by males throughout the entire history of the human race.  This should have struck all people as patently absurd, but through clever, emotion-based propaganda, the Jews were able to garnish wide support for this insane assertion.  The Jewish racial “equality” movements were based on the ridiculous concept that “race does not exist,”  just so the gender “equality” movements asserted that “gender is a social construct.”  This Marxist doctrine cannot be viewed as anything other than a war on the Natural Order.

What is a Woman?

The human species, not too terribly long ago, existed in balance with the natural world.  We lived in tribes, hunting and farming our food.  Like all other species on the planet, the most base drive, beyond self-preservation, was the propagation of our genes.  Within this order of nature, it was necessary for males and females to take on variant roles in society, due to their variant physical forms.  It was impossible for a man to birth a child, just as it was impossible for a woman to spend days fighting the elements hunting, or fighting in a war over resources with a neighboring population.  Because of these variant roles, which resulted from the variant physical characteristics, the sexes maintained variant psychological make-ups and definitively variant identities.  Absolutely nothing about our biology has changed, but still the Jews, with their doctrine of cultural Marxism, actually expect us to believe that none of this matters anymore, simply because it is now possible, due to technology, for a woman to provide herself with food and shelter without the assistance of a man.

Filipina women are not susceptible to Jew feminism: "I'm sorry sir, we are very busy holding babies and cooking noodles.  Please do not ask us our opinions on politics."

Filipina women are not susceptible to Jew feminism: “I’m sorry sir, we are very busy holding babies and cooking noodles. Please do not ask us for our opinions on politics.”

It is the biological nature of a man to feel a need to protect and care for women, given that it is the woman that ensures his genes are passed on.  The biological nature of a woman includes a desire to be cared for and protected by a man.  The woman, having a much higher level of estrogen than a man, has an entirely different psychological make-up, and is much more driven by emotion – she is designed this way, because it is this orientation which allows her to properly nurture children.  Because of this much higher level of emotion which exists in her psychological processes, it is clearly only sensible for her to allow men to make the major decisions about issues of key importance, at least those which do not involve children.  Because in the natural world, the man, due to his own psychological drives, is always going to be driven to do what it best for the one who births and cares for his progeny, he will make these decisions with the good of his women in mind.

I will note here that a post-menopausal woman, whose psychological make-up changes due to a rebalancing of emotions, is often able to think much more like a man, and thus we have the the archetypal image of the “wise old woman.”

The Jew has preyed on the weakness of the woman, and drawn her into his sickening game.

The filthy Jew has preyed on the weakness of the White woman, and drawn her into his sickening game.

Both men and women posses a base, animal drive to reproduce.  This is what hornyness and sexual attraction are.  Regardless of popular Marxist doctrine, the reason that the sex act exists is to make babies; this doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be enjoyable, but the fact is, if we were capable of producing offspring through binary fission, we would not have sexual organs at all.  The reason sex is enjoyable is the same reason a steak tastes good – when you see a juicy piece of meat, you don’t say “I need to consume this source of iron,” you say “that looks delicious”; in the same way when you see an beautiful woman, you don’t say “I would like to use this person as a means to reproduce my genetics,” but instead feel emotions and physical urges.

The difference between men and women is that the man’s body does not know whether or not he has produced children.  Though I think a man can consciously develop a desire to produce children, even within a cultural paradigm that tells him this is unnecessary and simply a burden upon him, a woman’s body knows that she has not produced a child, and this can lead to psychological unrest and ultimately a form of mental illness.

What the Jew has Done to Her

A woman is by nature designed to focus on producing and nurturing children, as well as caring for the emotional needs of her male partner.  She is not designed to bring home food, even when bringing home food amounts to acquiring monetary notes, rather than hunting or working a field.  When we as a society force a woman into the work place, we are robbing her of her most basic identity.  Women are either forced to forgo producing children in order to allow them to pursue a “profession,” or they are expected to perform the nigh impossible feat of raising and caring for children while holding a job.  In maintaining this feminist ideal as a foundational aspect of our modern society, we are destroying the right of women to develop and maintain the identity that nature bestows upon them.

Simone de Beauvoir conceived her attacks on the female sex while fornicating with enemy Jew Nelson Algren.

Simone de Beauvoir conceived her attacks on the female sex while fornicating with enemy Jew Nelson Algren.

In 1949, Simone de Beauvoir published The Second Sex, which is considered to be the dawn of the “second wave” of feminism (the “first wave” had been much more reasonable and was not even called feminism, and though it may ultimately not have been totally positive, it won’t be discussed here).  She herein made the insane assertion that the entire history of our species was a history of “female oppression,” argued that gender was a social construct and coined the term “reproductive slavery” to describe the female role as life-giver.  Though de Beauvior was ostensibly not a Jew herself, the entire basis of her argument was drawn from Jewish sources, including Freud and Marx.

At the time she wrote the book, she was having an affair with the Jew novelist Nelson Algren.  Many Jews have asserted that he was the entire inspiration for the book, as she stated that before she met him, she had never perceived any inequality between men and women.  We may note that Simone’s long time boyfriend, the confusion artist, communist and Jew-lover (possible crypto) Jean-Paul Sartre, was having an affair with his adopted daughter, an Algerian Jewess named Arlette Elkaïm, while de Beauvior was sleeping with Algren.

Betty Friedan and the Dawn of Jew Feminism in America

The Jewish plot to destroy the western female really picked up speed in the chaos of the 1960s.  Jew psychologist Betty Friedan (born Bettye Naomi Goldstein) published the book The Feminine Mystique in 1963, where she presented the the bizarre assertion that virtually all American housewives were unhappy with their lives, and backed it up with faked studies.  She said that most if not all women were wasting their lives on children, while harboring the secret desire to be careering intellectuals and called this baseless claim “the problem that has no name.”

Enemy Jew Betty Friedan was said by her fighting comrade, the Jew Alvin Toffler, to have "pulled the trigger on history."

Enemy Jew Betty Friedan was said by her fighting comrade, the Jew Alvin Toffler, to have “pulled the trigger on history.”

Following the faked research of Alfred Kinsey, Friedan also claimed that most housewives were sexually perverse, having an obsession with sexual gratification due to their inability to be fulfilled by the thing that has fulfilled all female mammals since the beginning of existence: children.  She again use faked studies, which no other researcher was ever able to confirm or reproduce, to back up this scandalous assertion.

In promoting the insane fantasy that most housewives were sexual perverts, having constant affairs with anyone they could find, she made the impressionable housewives who read the book feel like they should also be doing this type of thing.  This process of indoctrinating women into the world of sexual perversion was later streamlined by Ms. Magazine.  Note that the Jewish race has a completely different set of values than White Europeans, and they have traditionally been much more sexually perverse.  Jewish women probably do tend to cheat on their husbands, and thus this is yet another example of Jews rewriting our cultural heritage and value system with their own.

With The Feminine Mystique, the sickening Jewess Betty Friedan laid out a blueprint for the collapse of the ancient European social order.  The weird Jewish advocate of the destruction of all society and its replacement with an insane science fiction nightmare world, Alvin Toffler, correctly called it when he declared that this book “pulled the trigger on history.”

Enemy Jew baby-killer Bernard Nathanson founded the National Association for the Repeal of Abortion Laws with a bunch of other Jews.

Enemy Jew baby-killer Bernard Nathanson founded the National Association for the Repeal of Abortion Laws with Betty Friedan.  The Jewish modern Jewish obsession with promoting abortion among their host populations definitely puts the historical allegations of Jewish ritual baby sacrifice in context.

Friedan later went on to found the National Association for the Repeal of Abortion Laws (NARAL), one of the most influential forces in the fight to legalize the murder of unborn children in America, with fellow Jew Bernard Nathanson.  The organization still exists as an advocacy group for the more extreme forms of abortion, such as partial-birth abortion, where the doctor waits for the baby’s head to start crowning and then drills a hole in his or her skull and sucks the brain out, as well as the “right” of high school girls to have abortions without their parents consent.  The organization is still run by Jews.

Additionally, though the founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, was allegedly not Jewish, her husband was.  After Sanger stepped down as the head of said organization, she was succeeded by Alan Frank Guttmacher, the Jewish son of a Rabbi.  Like the larger movement of feminism, the movement to psychologically manipulate fragile women into murdering their own children has been an almost entirely Jewish affair.

Gloria Steinem, the Radical Jew Culture Destroyer

In 1969, the Jewish abortion promoter Gloria Steinem published the essay After Black Power, Women’s Liberation (note the direct, shameless piggy-backing onto the Black rights movement – Jews have continually exploited Black people as a means to promote their own goals), where she just repeated everything that Friedan had said in a more extreme manner.  The Jew-dominated media catapulted this into the public mind, awarding it with relevance by pretending to be opposed to it, rather than tossing it aside as utterly irrelevant pseudo-intellectual communist revolutionary gibberish.  This is yet another example of the media deciding what matters, while being able to promote it on any grounds they wish.

In October 2006, the used up commie Jew slut Gloria Steinem, in her Ms. Magazine publication, printed the names of  5000 women who were proud they had abortions, putting her own name on the list.

In October 2006, the used up commie Jew slut Gloria Steinem, in her Ms. Magazine publication, printed the names of 5000 women who were proud they had abortions, putting her own name on the list.

In the essay, she hailed a new dawn of sexual promiscuity and divorce as a positive social development.  She did not simply push the idea that women have a right to choose how they live their lives, but demanded that women who desire a traditional lifestyle be attacked and terrorized, calling them “Uncle Toms.”  She directly implied that abortions are great, and every woman should have one. She openly declared communism, and cited her racial brother and comrade, Karl Marx, as a source of her opinions.

She was promoting a Big Lie in the way only a Jew could.

Speaking on the issue of forming a radical “women’s rights” movement within the existing chaos of the wider Jewish-driven cultural revolution raging through traditional American society, she says:

[Women] couldn’t become black or risk jail by burning their draft cards, but they could change society from the bottom up by radicalizing (engaging with basic truth) the consciousness of women; by going into the streets on such women’s issues as abortion, free childcare centers, and a final break with the 19th century definition of women as sex objects whose main function is to service men and their children.

Let’s think about what this means.  We first notice that she is promoting radicalization of consciousness, which is Jew-speak for inciting hysteria.  She claims that American women are going to do this “from the bottom up,” which is interesting coming from a public figure who belongs to an alien race and is setting herself up to be the leader of this movement.  She then goes on to claim that women should no longer bear responsibility for their own actions, instead the government and society should, before claiming that being a mother amounts to de Beauvoir’s “reproductive slavery.”

The interesting thing here is that the exact situation that we have now could have come about by exciting White men to radicalization.  A Jewish man could have popped up and been promoted by the media, claiming that White men were sick of working to support their families, that having to pay for food and a house for a woman and her children was a form of slavery to women, that women only wanted them for their sperm and men were finally standing up and demanding the right to divorce their wives and force their girlfriends to have abortions; if there were children involved, they were demanding the government to raise them for free.

The reason that the Jew did not launch a masculinist movement declaring that women were leeches that needed to get jobs and pay for their own needs and children has to do with the above mentioned issue of the differences between male and female biology.  Women are much more volatile and susceptible to emotional propaganda.  If the Jew would have come out with a radical men’s liberation movement, men would have laughed and dismissed it as ridiculous, with even the most feeble-minded of them saying to themselves “well, not having a wife and kids would allow me more free time and a lot of extra spending money, but I kinda like my wife and kids” – because for men, logic will trump emotion, all things being equal.

Jew Robin Morgan, an editor of Ms. Magazine, had her 1970 feminist anthology Sisterhood is Powerful

Enemy Jew Robin Morgan, editor of Ms. Magazine and author of the influential 1970 radical feminist anthology Sisterhood is Powerful, was a founding member of W.I.T.C.H. (Women’s International Terrorist Conspiracy from Hell); in 1969, this Jewish terrorist group staged a protest at a bridal fair, chanting “here come the slaves/off to their graves” at the goyim women who wanted to get married and live happy lives.

Jews play on weakness.  These victors of World War Two began destroying the foundations of our society as soon as they were finished with Hitler’s Germany, and they did this by attacking weaknesses and exploiting them.  They used Blacks – a genuinely disenfranchised group – as a battering ram against traditional White society, stirring up violence on both sides and making the situation unworkable, they stirred up the idealism of youth against their own war in Vietnam, the exploited the teenage sex drive and desire to release energy with their free love and drugs.  And they attacked the emotional vulnerability of women with the feminist movement.

Steinem later went on to found Ms. Magazine, a radical feminist publication that encouraged women to have sex with as many strangers as possible, have regular abortions, fight with their husbands and complain constantly.  It played up this imagined victimhood, claiming that traditional gender roles amounted to some kind of a holocaust.

The fire that these Jews lit in the 1960s has just kept on burning.  It isn’t going to go out until there’s no more fuel – meaning that our traditional culture has been completely exterminated – or until someone stands up and puts it out.

The Here and Now

The effects of the Jewish feminist movement that began in the 1960s have been staggering.  We are now living in a world where females literally have no idea what they are, and are forced at every stage of their life to be something different than what their biology is demanding that they be.

Whereas the Jews demanded that it was a “right” of the female to work, it very quickly changed into a duty.  A traditional single-income household is now almost entirely a thing of the past.  This was no doubt a part of the Jewish feminist agenda, as given that when you add women to the workforce, you double the amount of available labor, and thus labor itself is only worth half as much in this unregulated capitalist system.  This has put a tremendous burden on those families still existing the West.  I wonder what percentage of women today would be willing to go back and trade abortion rights, “freedom from reproductive slavery” and all of the rest of the incomprehensible, sentimentally romanticized Jew gibberish that the baby-boomer generation bought into for a chance to live a traditional lifestyle.  Surely, whatever perceived oppression women felt they were suffering under in the post-war period couldn’t have been as bad as this.

Enemy Jew Naomi Wolf leads the new feminist movement.

Enemy Jew Naomi Wolf, once married to Bill Clinton’s Jew speech writer and New York Times editor, David Shipley, leads the new feminist movement.

Like the ground-breaking feminist movement of the 1960s and 70s, the modern feminist movement, often referred to as the “third wave,” is totally  dominated by Jews.  The entire media apparatus, even that which claims to be conservative, has embraced the doctrines of feminism.  Promiscuity is now promoted in schools, with marriage largely having become a thing of the past.  Forty percent of children are born out of wedlock.  The entirety of the Jew-run entertainment media apparatus promotes all of this, endlessly churning out more and more degrading material to force down the throats of the proles.

Presently, one in three pregnancies in this country ends in abortion.  I do not think the statistics are available on what percentage of these babies are White, but it is rather obvious that it would be the vast majority.  Because of the death of morality – brought to you by the Jews who crushed Christianity by turning it into a religion of soulless material pursuits and spinning it into the realm of science fiction – you now have teenage girls getting pregnant in high school; 50 years of feminism have convinced a large percentage of people in this country that it is then her “right” to murder the child without even telling her parents.  Schools are known to have feminist guidance counselors who encourage them to make this decision.

Even if one were to make the argument that abortion is a morally sound form of birth control, it is a known fact that women who kill their babies develop life-long psychological problems because of it.  Killing ones own children is one of the most blatantly deranged and insane aspects of this hellish Jew-ridden society we live in.  Can you imagine a monkey or a wolf killing her own children because “they have other things to do with their life?”  This is not simply murder – it is an attack on the most fundamental aspect of all life on earth – the desire to reproduce.

How much more of this are we willing to take from these sickening Jews?  When is enough going to be enough?

Conculsion

I am not arguing against feminine strength.  I am not claiming that every single woman should be doing nothing but cooking and making babies.  I am simply saying that the vast majority of women have a deep-rooted desire to be protected by men so that they are free to focus on producing and raising children.  This does not mean that some special individual females won’t decide to engage in intellectual pursuits, and certainly doesn’t mean that women are incapable of engaging in intellectual pursuits.  The reality is that women do very well working in a lot of different fields, as long as they are not placed in positions of authority, but the fact remains that this is not generally what women would choose for themselves if they were given the choice, as it leaves them either absolutely emotionally and physically drained as they attempt to do careering along with raising children, or leaves them hollow and unfulfilled if they forgo raising children in favor of pursuing a career.

We should also be thinking about the children themselves – could any of this possibly be good for them?

It is my contention that women should be able to choose for themselves what kind of life they want to live, but the default position of society should be to provide a climate where women are encouraged to birth and raise children.  All throughout history we have had scenarios where exceptionally strong women have played major roles in the larger whole of public society.  However, for most powerful, intelligent and passionate women, the old saying that “behind every great man, there is a great woman” has held the truth of the matter.  Women, as wives and mothers, provide the home environment within which men are capable of becoming successful in their endeavors.

The hard reality is that the feminist movement is not a product of Western civilization; it is, like every other major change our society has underwent in the last 100 years, a creation of the Jew.  It is impossible that without the Jewish influence, White society would have embraced these radical changes to the social order.

If men are to become men again, and rise up with strength and fury and take back their society, it must follow that women also become women again, resuming their role as the backbone of our society, taking care of the home, raising healthy children and providing emotional respite for their husbands.

What we seek to do is restore the natural order which the Jew has upset with his lies and manipulation.

This entry was posted in 1960s, America, Cultural Marxism, Culture, Degeneracy, Disinformation, Feminism, History, Ideology, Jews, Morality, Propaganda, Psychology, Women and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

84 Responses to Feminism: A Jewish War on Femininity

  1. SILIEZAR says:

    girls compete with each other to be succesful, pretty, become succesful moms or simply no time for babies(the end of human kind), and also compete with guys, its a tough world outside. the outcome: they are crazy as shit.

  2. Pingback: Feminism: A Jewish War on Women | JewishProblem.com

  3. Pingback: VIDEO – AGENDA: Grinding America Down | Pragmatic Witness

  4. Matt says:

    Excellent article, in fact one of the best ones I have ever read.

    Women are so weak and defenseless against brutality.

    If we don’t protect them they could get mutilated and raped as the German women by the Russians and Allies. What they did to Germany’s women is unspeakable, it’s a miracle the German people survived that.

    You can only protect a woman if you bring her into submission, and feminism competes against that necessity. Feminism threatens the lives of our women because when they have the audacity to be “strong and independent” they fall prey to the most vile and sleazy vices of foreign men who will enforce themselves over them, and shatter these delusions. Just ask the pimped out whores of Britain.

    Only you as a White Man can stop that, and it starts with disallowing feminism, or any residue of this poison, to have any sway over your moral posture.

    Then you must strength both your body and mind so you are always ready to fight.

    Feminism will kill our women.

    Resist it, fight it.

    manhood101.com

  5. James Tysan says:

    This site is just so out of touch with anything worth writing about in such depth.
    The writers of this thread are conspiracist morons who evidently have no clue about what fascism actually means. You are the most indoctrinated people on earth if you think the Jew is behind anything of malice. Let the holocaust be the lesson to you in what happens when we target one race and idolise another.

    • Matt says:

      Thanks for adding nothing of value to this thread, except of course your self-righteous indignation, which is only a silver medal when it comes to making intelligent arguments.

      Cry harder.

  6. Shefali says:

    I read your article with interest. I am a woman with a fairly high IQ (150) and an engineering degree. My thoughts, for what they are worth:

    Hormones play a role in human behavior. I personally remember how clearly I thought BEFORE puberty and how emotionally drive I became right afterwards. However, for mature, self-disciplined women – we learn to cope with the hormones and mitigate their effects on our behavior. For that reason, having PMS does NOT excuse my acting rudely. Similarly, when we are in pain, it does not excuse letting it “all go”. Allowing these things to control us is a choice. So is learning to control ourselves.

    I am not a man so I don’t know how male hormones effect them personally, but I am sure that there are also changes in male behavior due to testosterone surges, etc.

    Unfortunately I came of age when the school systems were rife with feminist propaganda, and being very bright I was pushed to pursue a career – not a bad thing – at the expense of family (a bad thing). However, being of a reflective nature, I’ve re-assessed myself, and learned to create a balance. I LIKE being a woman – but not just a woman, I LIKE being a lady.

    My parents came to America from India and one positive thing they did teach me which the propaganda did not ruin – I learned good manners and also sexual restraint. Both of which have served me well. I would hear other women complain about men treating them rudely, etc., at work or in social situations, but these men were always gentlemen with me. I think there is something within men – when they are around a lady, they become more chivalrous.

    Also, women LIKE to nurture. The most successful female managers I knew were also motherly. Not necessarily in a demonstrative way, but the sense of being nurtured was there. One lady I knew, a senior manager at Lucent, was very quiet, understated, and yet also very feminine. If you messed up on a project, she just quietly emoted disappointment so you would work your buns off to do better.

    One reason I think women cannot do as well in the military – it’s not a milieu that meshes well with feminine strengths, and a woman who tries to be a “ball buster” is like a fish on a bicycle.

    I personally think women can lead men in many situations when they are able to be seen as “mothers”, but the military – nope. Plus, even in a world where the playing field is totally level, I doubt there will be nearly as many women leaders as men. Most women simply are not as driven nor as outward focused.

    In the home, it makes sense for the man to be the leader, though the form of this depends on the couple. In my marriage, we have a very egalitarian arrangement, but he is more driven to protect me and I am more driven to nurture him. I iron his hankies and he shields me from many situations. Most of the time we make decisions together but every once in a while he uses an authoritative voice and when he does – I don’t argue.

    One thing I learned from my parents – they had an arranged marriage (which was done back in India in their day) and yet they were very happy, very romantic. He was singing her love songs the day before he died, after 40 years of marriage. One thing I observed – she had her opinions and would even argue with him – IN PRIVATE. In public, she never contradicted him. She also supported him even if she didn’t always agree with him. Once he made a decision, even if it was against her advice, she backed him up.

    One thing our society seems to have lost sight of – marriage and family require generosity. No marriage is perfect because none of us is perfect, but you have to be unselfish. If you can’t sacrifice for your family…. the values of this modern age seem to be emphasizing selfishness. And not just with family, but with everyone – friends, neighbors, etc., all seem more selfish and more ill-mannered. It’s not just in America – my Mom tells me that in India society is also much more selfish. In “the old days”, neighbors looked out for each other more. Now, there is a harshness and selfishness that didn’t use to be there.

  7. Fred Miller says:

    I don’t think you have a good grasp on what the family is, more specifically the patriarchal family. The patriarchal family was designed to be able to transfer the loyalty that the female has to her children so that the man is able to “have” his own children too. Being able to establish his fatherhood by the fidelity of his wife gave the man an incentive to work for more than his own life. His love for his biologically produced children from his own DNA is the is the foundation of civilization.
    Civilization is artificial and so is the male headed family. The jungle is natural and so is the female headed family.
    For a good understanding what I am talking about I would suggest you read the book, “The Garbage Generation” by Daniel Amneus. A copy of it can be found at fisheaters.com/garbagegeneration.html. Its a Catholic website but the book is not.

    Fred Miller

  8. abey says:

    Women fall for “Appeasings” come down from eden. “He will not regard the desire of women”. For the Average woman bringing forth children is her basis desire unto her fulfillment. But now to control world population is seen appeasings through Abortions , Gay Agendas, Planned Parenthoods, Feminism, Encouraging divorces all in the name of liberty but to every sin under the sun to spiritual enslavement, is but to deceiving her by her basic wants, Spiritually undiscerned the basic cause, which is supposed to be filled by the Man.

  9. Jewish Feminist Marxist Pederastic-pedophilic Sartrean says:

    Hi, I’m a Jewish Marxist/Feminist/Sartrean/pedophile/pederast/hebephile and I fancy all the little German boys in your cover photo on your website.

    That is all.

    By the way, have you read Simone’s memoir, “My Experiences in Teaching”? It is my favorite book.

    Good day.

  10. YemachshemotoAndrewAnglin says:

    Andrew, I demand you shut this page down.

  11. fuckyour life says:

    website for subhuman stupid clowns

    • Andrew Anglin says:

      Oh really? Please, elaborate. It seems you are quite eloquent and capable of formulating your thoughts in a sharp, intelligent manner. So it would be fantastic if you would explain why it is you believe we are stupid subhumans.

      Without having it explained to us by the likes of you, how shall we ever understand our folly?

  12. john thames says:

    Excellent analysis.

  13. Justanormalman says:

    Found this on the internet that speaks loads:

    “I am a white male who happens to have a beard in college a the moment, and I took a seminar of Procrastination, yes Procrastination. However, when the seminar woman showed up, it seemed I was in a White Men Are The Devil seminar. It turns out she’s the department head of Women’s Studies at my school. She went on ranting about how beards symbolize chauvinism and such . . . in a Procrastination seminar… ?!?! Well I just got up and gave her the evil eye and left and complained to the school. I was surprised to see that the school made her leave me a message on my telephone explained that she was sorry and inappropriate.

    Regardless, Why the hatred of beards??! Makes no sense.”

    Grow your beard with pride!!!!!!

    It’s healthy, normal AND a political statement, IMO.

    If women don’t like it; tuff luck. If we all do it, they will have no other choice than to love it!

    • HA says:

      The hatred for beards is a subliminal attack and demonization of Muslims and likely has little to do with white males.

  14. Pingback: The Jewish War on Morality |

  15. Cesare Bonventre says:

    In the USA, the Rockefeller trust funded the American feminism movement so that the state could raise the kids & to double the work force!

    Or so it was said in online video by Aaron Russo

    • Andrew Anglin says:

      I think he just made that up so he could blame it on a non-Jew. They asked Rockefeller about that and he said he’d never met Aaron Russo.

  16. bloodywolf14 says:

    Hello Andre. Good article! I just wrote an article about (modern) feminism. It was ‘inspired’ by your article.

  17. Pingback: Feminism: Jews, Jews, Jews | Essays by a sceptical European

  18. Pingback: Andre of TotalFascism.com Interviewed by Carolyn Yeager: “We Must Restore The Natural Order” |

  19. Mark says:

    For those who are too lazy to read this (like me) here’s a computer narrated version. The voice that seemed to work the best was UK female “Amy”.

    http://www.mediafire.com/?p1986tundwyho9z

    • Carolyn says:

      Mark, It sure wasn’t a woman who wrote this, but a woman narrated it. Women just don’t talk or write this way. But it “worked best” to have a female voice, haha.

  20. Pingback: Feminism: A Jewish War on Femininity – Andrew Anglin |

  21. serious says:

    Thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this report, Andre, and to the detailed commenters. I have never read any of the books you outlined here, and do agree that these early ‘feminists’ you mention are operating according to the Jewish agenda.

    However, there is a history of violence against women, as evidenced by Martin Luther’s rule of the thumb, saying that husbands could beat their wives as long as the rod was no thicker than their thumb. For ages, (even now in some circles) women’s mothers and fathers told them they could not leave their abusive husbands. And Hugh Heffner’s Penthouse, et al (Jews) influenced men to give their wives a hard time if they did not measure up, and to sleep around, leaving women very unsatisfied. Please, may decency thrive, if only for the sake of the children.

    • Aservant says:

      This rule of thumb myth has been discounted by many people many times over. It is a lie. It is feminist propaganda akin to Jewish propaganda about the holocaust.

      The “violence against women” meme is another massive, cultural fraud, with the rule of thumb law being part of it. The fact of the matter is that women, especially western women, have been protected and sheltered throughout history to the point of being a very privileged class of people. They have become so privileged today that they have very little appreciation, if any, for the amazing freedoms and rights that they enjoy now, almost exclusively earned for them with the blood of the males that they are betraying today.

      Has there been abuse and violence against women? Of course there has been. Tell me what makes their abuse so special? Nothing. Millions of men have been abused by other men and women as well, murdered, tortured, sent off to war to die for the rich, and worked to death in hideous jobs in an attempt to provide for their sheltered wife and children at home. What appreciation have they gotten? Zero. You won’t get any special tears from me only for them. As Zundel said in an interview, “The Jews have no copyright on suffering”. I’ll say here; neither do women.

      The little abuse and violence against women that has been committed has been grossly and disgustingly exaggerated by modern feminists as part of their power play to paint themselves into the role of eternal victim, just like the Jews do. No coincidence of course, for as Andre has already outlined in detail, feminism is a Jewish paradigm. If you don’t believe me about this exaggeration, refer to the book I mentioned earlier where it is explained how feminists spread complete and total lies about the epidemic of violence on Superbowl Sunday and the other whooper of a lie that in recent decades domestic violence has become the number one cause of birth defects. And these are just two of thousands of lies. The rape statistics are included in these as well. Although very credible people like Hoff Summers exposed the first two examples that I just named to be complete frauds as long ago as the early 90s, these two facts are still stated as true in “stop the violence campaigns” against women across the country, even in university educational material. It is the propagation of hundreds of lies like these that leads people like you to believe in the “violence against women” tripe.

      Quit it, it’s a fraud. If you are at this site, you should be much wiser than that. Are you hasbara by chance?

      The fact of the matter is that almost all western men are very offended and have always been by the thought of violence against women. Actually, I think most men period are, but I will not speak for the men of other cultures. Before our “enlightened, modern age”, raping a woman or even much less, like just insulting her honor, would have gotten you lynched by her brothers, father and uncles, and it would have happened quick.

      But as they say, you shouldn’t wish too hard for something, you just might get it. This is the situation that the modern western female finds herself in today. After ridiculing, betraying and disrespecting the men for so long that built the comforts and advances of this society that she enjoys, she is largely being abandoned. Results? In recent years, 38,000 white women raped by black men in one year. Black women raped by white men? Less than 10 for the same year. Check the FBI crime stats. Jared Taylor can help you with that. That is just one stat. Now finally, a real wave of violence against women may be beginning due to them being dropped as being worth the effort of protection by their once loyal men.

      So like the boy that cried wolf one too many times, no help is here to protect these women when they finally need it. And really, I know it sounds harsh, and I don’t wish them or anyone else harm, but I could care less. These women didn’t need anyone, they claimed, male leadership was oppressive, and they are completely equal in every way to a man. I would never be so arrogant as to claim that I am equal in every way to a woman. There are scores of things that a woman can do much better than I , I wouldn’t even try to compete. So, I for one then, will respect their wishes; let them have at it. Karma is a bitch. They sowed it, let ‘em reap it.

      Personally, 95% of the time, altough there are some exceptions, if I were to pass a modern, western woman on fire on the side of the road, especially a Canadian or American one, I wouldn’t take the time to even stop to piss on her. It would make more sense to bathe in gasoline and light myself on fire.

  22. right on.
    This picture says all:
    http://www.cheshirecatstudios.com/pictures/images/postfeminism-cum-shot.jpg

    They know it’s easy to manipulate women and by declaring ‘women’s lib’ and even giving them the vote. Women consider the relationship and the family the entire world. So her struggle for power is in the family and her main obstacle is her husband. Give her state help and you’ll get what we have today.

    The problem is, women will never understand. And worse still: we have only ourselves to blame. We are responsible for their protection and we have failed miserably. Also, we were easily bribed by cheap sex. Men are ruled by their dick, and as long as we continue to allow that, our women are just up for grabs.

    • Half-blood Polack says:

      That picture was slightly disturbing, but it has some truth to it (The concept). I found that the “feminists” I have encountered didn’t dislike men, but saw other people as nothing but tools used for pleasure, and would just go “clubbing” every weekend then brag about how many guys they managed to blow in one night.

    • Aservant says:

      I busted my gut at the sight of that picture. Yep, says it all…..

  23. ewkeane says:

    Here is Bowden on Feminism, part 1 of 4
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2p7nPytxMZw

    • Carolyn says:

      Okay guys, let’s get real. Bowden was a homosexual. That’s why they love him so much over at Counter-Currents. Greg Johnson first met Bowden when he hosted B. for a speech given at an Occidental Quarterly meeting (I think that’s correct. Johnson wrote about it.) He kind of fell in love with Jonathan Bowden, bought some of his horrible paintings, and next time JB came to make a speech, he stayed with GJ again. They were scheduled for a 3rd meeting when JB suddenly died. GJ was in grief, and continues to promote Bowden and all his work at C-C, kind of in a fetishist style. No doubt about any of this in my mind.

  24. nobodyfromnowhere says:

    In the 60′s, they made an Italian movie titled “Divorce Italian Style”, starring Marcello Mastriani (it is a pretty good black humor movie, with english subtitles). The talk associated with it was how ridiculous it was for Italians, so heavily influenced by the Catholic Church, to have to resort to extreme measures to rid themselves of unwanted mates. This movie, via humor, subjected those who did not believe in divorce, to subconscious RIDICULE.

    A few years later, they made a Hollywood movie entitled, “Divorce American Style”, with Dick Van Dyke and Debbie Reynolds. This was also an entertaining movie, but, it was also a subconscious weapon against traditional Americans by making it seem like divorce was almost commonplace and it was also commonplace to reduce a fruitful and hard-working father and husband to sheer poverty (child-support, alimony, etc.).

    It was a few years after these two movies (which were very popular back then), that a virtual WAVE of divorces came about, practically in every state (save Louisiana, where they were slower to get on board).

    I watched as several of my friends and coworkers found themselves at the mercy of “family courts” (so-called) due to the emotional instability of their middle-aged wives, who were driven to feel “unfulfilled” from all the media crammed down their throats. I knew several of these wives and I wouldn’t have believed it, even a few years earlier. These folks were all brought up in traditional America, with traditional American values, and, it was an ugly transformation that drove them to call a lawyer on their husbands (good men all).

    As this was going on, my own wife, also brought up very traditionally, was beside herself that these women (many of them her friends), one by one, were ‘siccing a lawyer after their husbands, getting the house, car, and payments FOR NOTHING, and then becoming sluts in a vain attempt to get “fulfilled”. It made me a little nervous, but, at least, my OWN wife saw through all this and so I felt reassured that I would be spared that fate.

    Wrong! Sooner or later, no matter how level-headed and loyal a woman is, with constant badgering from all avenues, even they will give in. I got the same treatment, although I managed to get ahead of the curve and minimize my loss.

    I had a heart-filled conversation with my aged grandmother about this during those times, and she allowed as how she herself, way back when she was in her 30′s, and overcome with so many children and so much poverty, had wanted to LEAVE MY GRANDDADDY. She confessed that she actually had thoughts along those lines, but, as she said, “there was nothing I could do about it back then”. Then she smiled and quickly added, “I’m mighty glad I DIDN’T”.

    From all this I see clearly that Americans, absent the pervasive influence by jews and other malignant “progressives”, would never had allowed divorce to become so widespread – it is in the nature of ordinary Americans to stick it out with the “love of your youth”,
    and forgo these foolish ideas about “fulfillment” and regaining youth. Women should never be given enough options to DESTROY their husbands and the future of their children, and even their own future – they are just too unstable when enduring hard times.

    The traditional marriage vows of “love, honor, and OBEY”, need to be re-instilled in the psyche of our young women. Men need to also understand their duty to live up to the “love, honor, and obedience”, of their wives. We have veered way of course over the last 50 years – so far that I have doubts about being able to find our way back.

    I suspect there will be a harsh period of turmoil before traditional family values are restored, after 50 years of such an assault on our centuries-old cultural values.

    Even though there are some men who want only to be head-of-household and apply all the fruits of their labor to their wives and children, there are many more men of age who grew up seeing the horrors flung down upon good men (sometimes their own fathers), and, for these young rascals, any let up on women’s rights (so-called) would result in massive abandonment as these rootless men would bed down any consenting female they could, promising her anything she wanted to hear, and trucking on to the next one.

    These harsh “family laws” have been so destructive to the good nature and family-oriented instincts in men, that it would probably take a generation to flush out the wild hairs that have been seeded.

    If these family laws are to be set aside, then, be prepared for a large number of children whose fathers are nowhere to be seen, at least for many years before traditions finally get restored into the psyche of the American man. Its going to take a LONG time and it will be a very HARD road.

    • Andre says:

      Great comments.

      I grew up in a broken family, as most non-Jews my age in America, and absolutely understand what you are saying. It is very difficult to trust women.

      The goal needs to be to restore honor to the folk. If we do this, then people will desire for their behavior to line up with their self-image.

      • Maria says:

        To start with, great article.

        Quoting your ‘It is very difficult to trust women.’, I’m a female and I’m very sorry but… I have to agree with you. Women nowadays are something that I describe as ‘aliens’, they have nothing to do with what a woman should be. I know I have my eyes well-open, and that’s why I’m writing this.
        Well, I must confess I want to achieve a career (Military Archaeology and try to enlighten this) but I also want a family. A decent family, with noble and honourable values. My partner and my friends (all males) are always saying I was born in the wrong time.
        This is my last year in highschool, and if my female schoolmates are like this, I’m already fearing what I’ll find in the University. They’re completely dumb, blind, only carying about shoes, clothes, make-up and ‘hot guys’. I’ve tried to talk to them (wasted my time…) and the answer I got was ‘You’re such an old fashioned nazi-retarded!’.
        I really hate women, they’re disgusting. Sometimes I ask myself if it’s me who’s wrong with the fidelity and honour values, because I don’t see any other women practising such. I met my partner two years ago and we have a good relationship, and my mother and aunts are always asking me when will I find another one, because ‘life is to be lived!’.
        So yes, don’t trust women, sadly. They won’t give you any comfort, unless you buy them expensive gifts. They won’t listen to your problems and dreams, unless you take them to have dinner in an expensive restaurant.

        I apologize for any ortographical mistake, I’m from Portugal.

    • Aservant says:

      Excellent comment, I agree with every word.

  25. Aservant says:

    Excellent article Andre, and an aspect of the movement that is grossly neglected but of the utmost importance.

    I would like to inquire as to why you believe that it is only weak and pathetic men that believe that feminism is an attack on masculinity. There is no doubt whatsoever that feminism is a vicious attack on femininity, but I think the same can be said regarding masculinity as well. It seems to be an attack, in vintage Jewish style, on all decency and a healthy social order in its entirety. Valerie Solanas’ behavior was a great example, as were many of the writings of the hideous Andrea Dworkin. There are of course, many, many more. The work of many feminists are packed full of extreme misandric ideas, such as the statement, “Marriage is legalized rape”, and many, many feminists promote the idea that all violence and oppression in the world stems from the existence of masculinity only. For some real time confirmation on this, go to the Radfem hub on the website and read their discussions that speak of aborting the vast majority males in persuit of attaining a world that has only about a 10% male population for procreation and labor purposes. You will read at that site, which is held in quite high esteem amongst femininsts as being of the vanguard and “cutting edge” in their movement, some of the most ignorant, violent, psychotic outpourings of hate against all men that are to be found.

    So I am not exactly sure how it is that I am weak and pathetic if I conclude that thousands of statements by feminists that call for the extermination of men, or that state that all violence, evil and oppression stems from masculinity, that a lot of feminism is based on a virtriolic hatred of men.

    Would you care to explain?

    • Andre says:

      Ah, don’t take it too hard. I meant this to mean that while we are still technically allowed to be men, women no longer even have this option, as their identity has been completely obliterated. It is, as you say, in some ways an attack on men. But are you really afraid a bunch of butch dykes are going to kill 90% of the male population (or however that math would work out)? Or should we really just feel sorry for these women who feel so emotionally destroyed as to sit around talking about such things?

      It is an attack on masculinity, in the sense that removing the feminine from the society, you distort the concept of masculinity, and this has slowly gotten more and more extreme. But this is something of a side-effect, really.

      Then you of course have the difficulties with men getting work, due to the workplace being overrun by women, and the outlawing of men behaving like men at work, due to the presence of women.

      Anyway, I get your point. I have to fix a typo I just saw tomorrow, so maybe I’ll go ahead and add a “first and foremost” in there.

      • Aservant says:

        I see your point Andre, and like said, I thought the article was excellent, and you are completely on point about feminism destroying femininity. You are right that women are not allowed to be women anymore, but are men really allowed to be men?

        Just some food for thought.

        I really enjoyed your article because in the past few years while becoming Jew wise, I also got turned on to several anti-feminist blogs, several run by traditional women. I have done a lot of reading on this subject over the past few years. One of my latest reads was “Whole Stole Feminism” by Christina Hoff Summers. Yes, I know she is a Jew and a feminist, I am not endorsing her, but the book is a pretty good read for people like you that understand this angle. Summers differentiates between “equity feminists” and “gender feminists”, calling herself an equity feminist. She calls most of the latest wave of feminists gender feminists, as in one gender against the other in a struggle for power. The equity feminists claim to just want equality with men regarding the law, etc. but don’t view men as the enemy or the issue as a power struggle. Summers quite despises the gender feminists, and they hate her guts with a passion as well.

        Among many other things, the book details the happenings at conferences where Summers was an attendant. She explains the political and power maneuvering that the gender feminists have been involved in for past 30 years. I say the last 30 years because although the book was written in 1995, I know that the work that they were doing then has been continued to the extreme since. It is rather shocking to learn of the things that are revealed in this book. It is outlined, for example, how even at that time the gender feminists were succeeding in re-writing almost all text books to the point of fabricating history to show women in equal roles to men at all times throughout all of history. This is insane, for as we all know, positions of authority have been almost exclusively male for most of history in all major civilizations until recently. There is no way to teach true history without focusing primarily on male accomplishments. Instead of two pages about George Washington in the third grade, like it was when I was a kid, and two paragraphs on Betsy Ross, the woman that made the American flag, it is now reversed. And so on it goes in almost every case. You also learn in the book as to how these hard core gender feminists dominate whole faculties at major universities and receive millions of dollars in grants for projects like re-writing history, and that they have the endorsement of governors, senators, etc.

        Other sources have taught me that for example, things like recess for small kids have been way cut back to the detriment of mostly male children. Male and female children develop differently. Girls are much more submissive and eager to please at 8 years old, boys are much more inclined to explore, rough-house, etc. This is natural and necessary for proper, healthy development. Boys reach an intellectual stage at a much later age at a time when the girls are then doing their “exploring”. As a result of this corrupt situation, which really should just be called abuse, boys have fallen way behind in almost every measurable category and become very frustrated. 70% of behavior modification drugs given to children are given to boys when they respond to this situation. It is my opinion that these boys suffer from nothing besides being frustrated and not allowed to develop naturally at the appropriate ages, but it is not acceptable to their “keepers” that they express their natural, youthful, maleness. As a result, they are chemically “lobotomized”. When you look into the issue in depth, it becomes painfully obvious that these initiatives are at the behest of the feminist administrators at places like the National Educational Foundation that devise the policies, it isn’t just “happening”, or is the result of an oversight. It is planned this way to undermine males in the name of hate and power.

        50 years ago, at least half of teachers were male. Now, less than 15%, with the females all being churned out by a feminist dominated educational system. And I can say from personal observation that almost all of the 15% of male teacher that are left are effeminate or gay. Are you familiar with anyone that has attended university recently and been required to take women’s studies or gender studies? These courses are now required for many degrees, you must go through them to graduate. I have learned of 1000s of testimonials that these programs are man-hating secessions disguised as education. Many of the courses are taught by openly, hard -core lesbians that shout down dissenting opinions in class. There have even been many cases of students being expelled from the course for espousing contrary opinions to that of the professor which are always more conservative, traditional opinions. The professors are almost never censured for their actions. Traditional women are especially hated. I have watched countless videos on line of young women screaming down men on campuses with the most vulgar, abusive language while authorities cheer them on while taking part of some woman empowerment rally or gathering.

        Am I worried that some army of women or dikes is going to over take men as a whole and make us their slaves? Not in the least. I am worried about their proxies, the manginas, and this situation that I am describing is creating millions of them. The exact same thing is happening to men as a whole as is happening to white people as a group. If they go through the “system”, and most do as you know, they are brainwashed to deny and feel guilty about expressions of masculinity, just like is done with white people about their race. I have seen a huge percentage, I mean huge, of young males in the country become effeminized without even being aware of it. It wasn’t this way when I entered the workforce 27 years ago, not even close. I see fucking straight men in their 20s hugging all the time now, it makes me want to fucking puke. When I was that age you would have got knocked out trying to hug you buddy. Pat on the back or a handshake was proper, and still is actually. Right and wrong haven’t changed. In my male dominated trade, our supervisors told us to move our fucking asses and shut the fuck up when it was needed. And we did. Now, almost all of these young men will literally start to cry if you even ask them to do something sternly, but politely, or they will be so offended like a little girl that you can’t even talk to them. It really at times makes me want to punch the living shit out of them, and I think it would do them a world of good. Turn them into a fucking man at last.

        Right here it isn’t so bad because I am in rural TN, but in the cities and liberal areas, even here in east TN,I can say for sure that without doubt that the majority of adult males that I see now act like sissies and fags while still being heterosexual. That’s a huge reason as to why I got the fuck out of those places. They do such things like talk to their kids in little sing-song voices like a girl and let their wives humiliate them in public. They have been completely indoctrinated that to get a woman, it means pleasing her, not being a strong, prepared man that can provide and protect, like it used to be. Sure, pleasing your mate has always been a factor of importance, and it worked when people were normal. But throw into the equation now massively narcissistic, spoiled young women that have been taught a fantasy, the same as a lot of blacks, that most of their short comings are due to male oppression and that they can do anything that a man can, With this factor thrown in, pleasing a woman becomes groveling and giving into her every selfish, perverse, juvenile desire. It becomes feeding the pride of an ego maniac which makes her dangerous and the man pathetic and weak. The scary thing is, I see most of these young men really believing that this is the way things are and need to be, just like the true believer liberal believes whites need to spend their lives kissing the asses of blacks to reach their potential. They literally look like a n abused dog that will still grovel to its owner when feeding time comes, only now, feeding is pussy, and the abuse is knowing that with just one small offense you can have everything taken from you through a misandric court system.

        Although they preach a different persona, we all know how hateful and violent liberals really are due to their self-debasement that breeds self-hate that they then project on others. For example, they want to disarm all conservatives in the name of peace by sending armed soldiers to jack us up by force. Hillary Clinton spearheaded a peace initiative in Libya by raining 1000s of pounds of bombs on the Libyans heads. This is the evil of the liberal mindset. Or Jewish mindset, call it what you want.

        I fear this exact same disconnect is happening with most of the males in this country. They are becoming so debased and out of touch with their strong masculine self that all they have left are carnal pleasures and false securities that are given to them by women within this feminist dominated system. And just like a caged dog that can never get out and actually be a dog, he will kill for that bone that he is thrown everyday. It is all he has.

        It is a fact that women are just as violent as men, and actually, a pretty good case can be made that they are more violent, it is just that they do their violence by proxy or by stealth. Women, for example, are notorious poisoners as a method of murder. 70% or more of violent child abuse in the country is committed by women, for when they are confident that they are stronger than their prey, they have no compunction to act on their violent impulses. I was raised by I woman like this, so I know.

        The millions of manginas in this country are being conditioned to obey, and perhaps many are already there, to acquiesce to their female “keepers” quite readily in most cases. And if their mangina or white night hasn’t been completely broken and still has some self-respect, so it isn’t that easy to get him to do the deed, intimidation can then be brought in. They may still be unwilling to kill just by suggestion, but that doesn’t mean that they are brave. A false rape claim to manipulate him will do the trick, which by the way are now at epidemic levels. If that doesn’t work, accuse him of harassment, threaten to take his kids and house from him, say he is a child molester, or maybe out him at his work for going on Jew-wise sites to get him fired. Usually a combination of several of these tactics is used.

        Do you think this is too far out? I don’t in the least, I see it happening all around me. Frankly, most men in this country disgust me with allowing themselves to be treated as such, and sadly, the white men are the worst for it. But it is understandable. Name me a strong, masculine, honorable, male public figure or high profile role model for kids to look up to today. I can’t think of one. But I could sit here and name you hundreds of limp-wristed newscasters, flat slob, idiot Homer Simpson types in film or TV, goofy, clownish, Steve Harel types, effeminate, weak character politicians, the list goes on. Do you see anyone, I mean anyone, out there in the public eye that is admired that is even close to a “Marlborough Man”. You know, what they call a “Man’s man”? You will see some in the public spotlight that may be masculine, even macho, but almost always they are a “villain” in some way or put out there as something way beyond reality, like Dwayne Johnson, “The Rock”, involved in wrestling or some cheesy action film that no one takes seriously.

        This situation is not by chance, it is by design.

        When you go to that job that you’re gonna get Andre, put it to the test by doing the following. Behave as an assertive male that is very good at what he does. It can be stacking boxes or shoveling shit, it doesn’t fucking matter. If you are given deadlines, or have others under you that are given deadlines, hold them to them uncompromisingly. Explain this fairly in detail from the outset Keep unnecessary banter to a minimum, outwork everyone else. If your co-workers, male or female, are gossiping and/or whining like spoiled, little girls, let them know to quit their crying and get to work, like the men of my grandparents generation would say. Never participate in the stupid, mundane, effeminate conversations and subject matter that those that surround like to speak of. If you are prompted to speak of things outside of work, chose things of substance that you are well versed on. Be chivalrous with any worthy females that may be there, cold and indifferent to the progressive sluts. Always offer to do any heavy jobs for these same females and make sure that the management knows that you are available for overtime to get ahead, as a strong, ambitious man should.

        That is just a short list, but those are honorable, masculine traits. You’re a Hitler fan, right? I’ll bet he would agree with me word for word. I am almost willing to bet good money that even if you are in an environment exclusively male or close to it in this job, doing what I have outlined above will get you despised and probably fired right quick.

        There is a deep-seated hatred of masculinity in this fucked-up, Jewed society.

        Sorry, but I have to disagree brother will all due respect. Men are not free to be men in anyway anymore.

      • j3133 says:

        Andrew, you clearly aren’t very familiar with feminism if you think it is not also an attack on masculinity.

        Look to the sex disparity in college. Look at widespread drugging of boys who don’t want to sit still in class like girls because they learn actively. Look at the false rape culture in college.

        If you really think it’s easy to be a man these days, you must not be aware of the state of fatherhood, marriage, divorce, and the abuse industry.

        Yeah, it’s easy to be a man. If you don’t cohabitate with a woman and never have kids! But if you want a family, Jesus Christ it’s risky. Half the time your wife leaves you and takes the kids. You can’t even discipline your children. Your kids will be indoctrinated not only to believe lies but to hate you.

        Come on, man. Be more responsible with the things you say.

      • j3133 says:

        Oh, and resist the urge to pander to women. I have a feeling you said what you said because you wanted to pander to women’s desires to be treated like poor little victims. If this is just going to be another blog that cares more about appealing to women than about stating the truth, then you’re just wasting time.

  26. weisser wolf says:

    Excellent article! Looking back on what shifts have occured in our culture, particularly with regard to male/female roles it is absolutely stunning. Many women today act like whores; in the way they dress, they act, tons of makeup, casual sex, etc. The breakup of the family unit is a direct result of the Jewish lies telling women that they were worthless unless they had a job and were out of the home. Divorce is quick and easy with no stigma attached to it anymore. Getting women out of the home was a “two-for” for the Jews too; it wrecked the culture pitting men and women against each other in adversarial roles instead of complimentary ones, and it also put more money into the Jewish bankers coffers because they had more lemmings to steal from with SS, income tax, etc…

  27. countryman says:

    it wouldnt make very good propaganda if it was a british uniform and written in english,would it?

    check the frightened look in the childs eyes on the right and the way he is hiding his face (from the horror)

    and the one on the left with his angry eyes.

    a total contrast to every other family orientated picture from NSDAP germany.

    it looks to me like clever fake german propaganda.

    • Andre says:

      My bad. I guess I see what you are saying. I thought the dad just looked like a badass, but maybe one could take him to have a menacing, drunk look about him. If they were thinking along those lines. Anyway, I like the picture. Could be you’re right, could be you’re reading too much into it. It would be interesting to know if they manufactured fake propaganda posters for one another’s countries. I have never heard of or thought of that before. Seems like it would be more extreme, if they were going to do that.

  28. Salman Hossain says:

    Yellow people – ie. Chinese people in general have same as or higher IQ than “White” people and Indians living in the Western world generally have the same level of IQ as white people… so your claims are not entirely factual, Quex

    and “White people” evolved outta darker skinned Caucasoids in the Middle East, Central and South Asia -

    there are only 3 genes that determine’s one shade or colour… why are we even having a discussion on the Master race if the so-called Master race can’t defeat this tiny group of parasites called Jews?

    • Quex says:

      Yes, but yellow people are not very INVENTIVE people, they’re just copying everything that whites have created, including culture, like classical music, etc. But we know that civilization without progess and innovation is doomed to decline. This is law of nature.

      • James2 says:

        I was just about to respond with a similar answer, the Asians are robotic in their “high IQ” understandings.

        They are more “monkey see, monkey do”, with little innovation. Their collectivist societies reflect this attitude, as individualistic White cultures allow for more creativity.

        I respect the Asians more than the Blacks, and I simply think the kikes should be exterminated without any remorse or tears, seriously …you cry wolf too many times and people just won’t give a fck what happens to you.

    • Quex says:

      Whites have become victims of their own progress, wich makes them less and less motivated and mentally apathetic. Jews are just traying on human weakness, you cant blame cockroach for being cockroach.

      We are currently living in an age of death of civilization, Imperium Americae. Rome, Byzantine, Holy Roman Empire, have been born, florished and died out. Civilization is like living organism with it’s own life cycle.

    • Andre says:

      Agree with the first and third points, disagree with the second. The people of the Middle East are almost certainly a mix between European, Asian and African peoples. If you look at a map, this is pretty self-evident. It is also possible that some of them are mixed with Jews, who are a completely separate race, obviously. Probably these would be those who are running the Arab shill states like Saudi and UAE. I have some issues with the Arabs, but selling out is not in their blood. This is why I also suspect Mark Glenn may himself be partially Jewish. He surely looks like it.

      • Salman Hossain says:

        By Asian you mean Indic? or Orientals?

        Yes, there are Arabs, Persians, and Turks with Jewish blood as well….

        and since Middle Eastern people are mixed, do you think it negates them being Caucasoid? it is true they are mixed due to historical incidents and the flow of people from one place to the other – but my point was that the earliest Caucasoids or proto-Caucasoids come from the Middle East, Central, and South Asia before they reached Europe according to genetic studies and cultural anthropology, and linguistic evidence to back it up as well…sometimes there are olive skinned Southern/South-Eastern Europeans that can pass for Middle Eastern…would they be classified as being “White”?

        …but at least Middle Eastern people are aware of the Jewish Question better than others because they’ve had to deal with this nonsense for millenia…before Europe had to ever encounter a fucking semite!!!

        Quex, Yellow people are Innovative and Innovation at times supercedes inventions…in the real world…so u get the idea…maybe not inventive…but certainly innovative…the innovation of the yellow man is what makes white folks hooked onto video games and are rapid consumers of their automobiles and electronics…

        • Quex says:

          Maybe, but most electronic giants today are really multinational.

        • James2 says:

          I am sure White man gave the world microchips, electronics, electricity, automobiles, guns and classical musical Instruments that Asians use more than their traditional instruments …then they play classical Western music on them.

          Our philosophy exceeds theirs, and the philosophies that came out of India were founded by the Aryan race, these philosophies then swept Asia (such as the ancient vedas and some even say Buddha was White).

          They are an honourable tribe, devoid of compassion for us, but at least they are independent and work well with us.

  29. Quex says:

    Whoever is afraid that our planet will be covered with ocean of brown/black/yellow people are forgetting one little aspect – third world population explosion bacame possible only due to white-created civilization, by intensive agriculture, advanced technology and health care.

    Without enough whites, who maintain and manage this planetary system will eventually collapse, because lack of enough people with higher IQ. There would be hunger and famine outbreak and that would naturally regulate population problems.

    Large masses of browns and blacks will return back to south, where life is easier, and don’t require so much intellectual planning for survival. These whites, who survive this cataclysm, will organize again and recreate civilization free from jewish domination, as jews are not very productive/creative people and they will be wiped off from history without whites, who they iraonically hate.

    So i don’t see future so hopelessly bleak at all, on the contrary – we will get another oppurtunity not to repeat our mistakes.

    • James2 says:

      Good comment, I have similar ideas …I can’t see the Blacks or kikes surviving without White creativity; shame they are too stupid (Blacks) or too insane (kikes) to realise/accept this.

      Asians are more independent and more capable, but we gave them modern technologies and they went forward with it.

      Perhaps the future will be brighter when a few more Blacks and Asians realise what we have given them and that this “all Whites are evil, it is special to be non-White” attitude was invented by the vile tribe.

      Though I don’t see any compassion in the Asians or any intelligence in the Blacks, for the most part.

  30. countryman says:

    nice article and great blog andre.
    i think the picture at the top might be allied propaganda though.
    compare it to this one:

    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-uRf0B-pj1dg/UAQmtM0my3I/AAAAAAAADT0/zIBFZ2l_dG0/s1600/propaganda_family2.jpg

    • Andre says:

      Yeah I used that picture in another article. But the one in this article is definitely German. Note the German writing. And the German people. And the Hitler Youth uniform.

  31. Salman Hossain says:

    its noteworthy that religious jewish folks have the greatest number of kids – u should see orthodox jews in the diaspora or israel – they fucking breed like crazy!

  32. Salman Hossain says:

    its noteworthy that religious jewish folks have the greatest number of kids – u should see orthodox jews in the diaspora or israel – they fucking breed like crazy!

  33. Salman Hossain says:

    all Western Women of all shades are influenced by feminism, including blacks and other coloured folks – including Muslim women – its not a “White Women” thingy …

    please get a grip… women are easily brainwashed … not as much as men though that is…

  34. Salman Hossain says:

    Obama issued the national security insider threat over 2 weeks before Sandy Hook – he’s an uppity negro me thinks… of course he should rebel and execute those who carried out 9-11 … but them jews are very angry at him at the fact that he’s not doing enough for them…

    I am not his fan…but I don’t care whether he was born in Kenya or the moon…

    he does have some sorta inner understanding of the jewish problem and is trying to find a way to minimize their influence…

    him shooting jewish drones at afghan/pak kids under orders from his jewish masters is far better than him issuing the US army to go in full fledged to invade Iran and Pakistan – which them jews have been whinging about for the last 4 years… u’d rather have him than anyone else – including Hillary Clinton…

    he’s the lesser of the two evils… and I could care less about his alleged homosexual past either…

    he wants to nationalize health care – just like in Canada and the Scandinavian countries – he’s in the good books… he has withdrawn most troops from Iraq and is going to pull them outta Afghanistan soon as promised – a few thousand left behind are just symbolic to his kosher overlords…

    in realpolitik – actions speak louder than words… and I think he’s promoting America’s interests better than the others while still posing like a Jewish puppet

  35. Salman Hossain says:

    jews are parasites and take the worst case examples of abusive men out there – the alcoholics, the irresponsible ones, immature ones, violent ones, and use that as an example to portray all men or White men and now recently Muslim men as being male chauvinistic pig…

  36. Jan says:

    Hi Andre –

    Very interesting article! Gives me some ammunition for discussion within my family.

    Herzliche Grüße aus Deutschland.

    Jan

  37. Truth is Lethal says:

    I have to say everything looks pretty grim for western civilisation. But i still have hope ever since henry kissenger basicly threw in the towel saying israel would no longer exist within 10 years and that the united states is likely to betray them before being destroyed from the inside.

    But you know if one of the head ring leaders like henry kissenger just threw them under the bus then that means we are winning and also the fact that powerful people are preparing for a post no israel world tells us good times are ahead.

    They also said free energy would go maintream in a few years and it will usher in the complete end of zionism.

    if you cant control energy. you cant control the world so this part of history will never have a chance to repeat itself wich is a good thing.

    People also dont realise it too but obama is setting the stage to betray israel. He once called netenyahu a coward and a liar twice.

    I still cant help but feel obama is some sort of double agent pretending to be in bed with israel while at the same time setting the stage fore thier destruction.

    I mean look you gotta admit that everything obama has done its what zionists have wanted to do and you cant be a very good double agent if you dont make those you are trying to defeat happy.

    Remember the zionists wanted him assassinated for this very reason and thier guy was romney but through a stroke of luck we got obama again in defiance to who they wanted.

    I also suspect they know hes a double agent but is black mailing him and the rest of the world so the united states stays in check so he follows thier rules.

    Remember the samson option is the biggest threat to humanity and at the same time the biggest form of black mail in humanity.

    I wouldnt put it past those cowards to destroy the earth when they see signs we are breaking free. They are just that depraved and psycopathic.

    case in point we cant do anything till the samson option is rendered useless and with it they dont need bombs under washington to blow it up.

    There is no doubt in my mind the united states would betray israel the moment thier samson option gets castrated. that you can be sure of.

    • Andre says:

      Sorry, but I don’t agree with what you’ve said here. Israel is simply a symptom of the larger Jewish problem. And the US is absolutely locked down by Jews. It is certainly possible that the people of the United States will eventually get fed up with the Jewish state, but it simply isn’t possible that our present government ever will.

      Obama is the most Jewish president we’ve ever had.

      • Truth is Lethal says:

        yes the jews have the usa locked down but its all for israel and if israel were to no longer exist then taking care of them here wouldnt be a problem.

        i disagree with you about obama because he has to do what they say or the samson option button may be pressed.

        if you are saying hes the most jewish president we have ever had then every president we have had after 1913 is the most jewish because the president is just a puppet on jewish strings.

        The reason why everyone has to do what they say is because of mountains of blackmail.

        i mean honestly would you sacrifice the world and blow it up just to save your family temperarily. of coarse not.

        one thing i learned about the jews is you can not underestimate there evil and i wouldnt put it past them to go all samson option on is when all things go sour for them.

        if someone has the gun to your head while you are tied and bound to a chair or tells you we have your family and will kill them and tells you to do something you have to do it or die or your family dies and thats just the way it is. key thing is here dont blame the doer blame the blackmailer. obama is the doer and jews are the black mailer. If there were any other president in obamas place right now im 100% convinced they would have done everything he has done cause its all scripted and pre ordained

      • Salman Hossain says:

        i gotta disagree on that one …its Bush…

        Obama was way better than McCain, Hillary, or that stinking Mormon from Utah…whats his name Romney…

        Obama is way better than Bush….

        he’s still their bitch…but a more reluctant one…you’d rather have him than all the others out there… and he did issue the memo on Insider Threats in the USGOV –

        http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/11/21/presidential-memorandum-national-insider-threat-policy-and-minimum-stand

        Presidential Memorandum — National Insider Threat Policy and Minimum Standards for Executive Branch Insider Threat Programs

        MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES

        SUBJECT: National Insider Threat Policy and Minimum Standards for Executive Branch Insider Threat Programs

        This Presidential Memorandum transmits the National Insider Threat Policy and Minimum Standards for Executive Branch Insider Threat Programs (Minimum Standards) to provide direction and guidance to promote the development of effective insider threat programs within departments and agencies to deter, detect, and mitigate actions by employees who may represent a threat to national security. These threats encompass potential espionage, violent acts against the Government or the Nation, and unauthorized disclosure of classified information, including the vast amounts of classified data available on interconnected United States Government computer networks and systems.

        The Minimum Standards provide departments and agencies with the minimum elements necessary to establish effective insider threat programs. These elements include the capability to gather, integrate, and centrally analyze and respond to key threat-related information; monitor employee use of classified networks; provide the workforce with insider threat awareness training; and protect the civil liberties and privacy of all personnel.

        The resulting insider threat capabilities will strengthen the protection of classified information across the executive branch and reinforce our defenses against both adversaries and insiders who misuse their access and endanger our national security.

        BARACK OBAMA

        • Andre says:

          Obama is clearly worse than Bush in every possible way. Doubling the wars, doubling the debt, introducing every kind of new insane nonsense you can imagine.

          But I am not going to argue about this. The Jews picked him, like they pick every president, and every president gets worse, because this is a gradual progression. Saying that Obama is “reluctant” to work for the Jews is just goofy. This guy does not do anything at all other than read speeches on television. He is an actor. Look at the way he struggles to answer anything that he doesn’t have a scripted answer to. None of this is real. How can that not be obvious to you by now?

          • Salman Hossain says:

            Andre, I understand your point. Yes, he can’t answer anything half ass – and Bush couldn’t either – although Bush had a teleprompter and a mic attached to him – to help him cause he was just braindead…

            Obama signed shit loads of executive orders – orders that have not been enforced yet!

            Yes, he’s handpicked by them jews – but he withdrew most US troops from Iraq, didn’t he?

            So didn’t he save more American lives in the long run by pulling out the bulk of US troops from Iraq ASAP?!?

          • Salman Hossain says:

            I don’t think Obama doubled the debt or anything like that. The system was in place like that from the Bush era when America was seduced to fighting Jew wars that the debt kept rising – during Clinton’s years there was actually a surplus…

            and in either case, what debt are u talking about?!?!

            its a fucking scam to begin with! a debt to jew bankers? whatchabeenthinkin?

            no way jose!!!

            America has no debt – its a scam on paper!

            if you played monopoly and owed your bud 300$, would that $300 be real? or $300 in your imagination? if you ran out of notes to purchase houses and real estate with, would you be tallying it on a paper in your mind? is $$$ now invisible or whatever these roaches cook up in the book? I’m not sure u can accuse him of doubling the debt when the debt was a farce to begin with!!!

            • Salman Hossain says:

              I can guarantee people one thing, if Obama wasn’t running the US, the country would go down the tubes even more…

              its bad enough as it is…. Obama doesn’t run the economy – jews do -

              he can only do soo much…

              he may be a tribalist himself – helping out Black people and in the case of paranoid jewish nutcases who accuse him of being a “crypto-Muslim” – be helping out Muslims – if that charge is even slightly accurate….

              Obama, even if he’s a puppet, has more intelligence than Bush…

            • Salman Hossain says:

              I can guarantee people one thing, if Obama wasn’t running the US, the country would go down the tubes even more…

              its bad enough as it is…. Obama doesn’t run the economy – jews do -

              he can only do soo much…

              he may be a tribalist himself – helping out Black people and in the case of paranoid jewish nutcases who accuse him of being a “crypto-Muslim” – be helping out Muslims – if that charge is even slightly accurate…. but at the end of the day…I’d prefer him over all the other race traitors out there – many of whom are either part or complete jews…like Hillary Clinton or John McCain….

              Obama, even if he’s a puppet, has more intelligence than Bush…

  38. James2 says:

    I have noticed that alot of women in my extended family are very much traditional women, there is a weird hippy family that believes in feminism and free love …they are single-mothers and are pretty cranky all the time as they have hard-lives going from man to man while trying to take care of children and work. The married ones are so much happier and more pleasant.

    They are obviously being oppressed by males, somehow, even though men generally just “pass-through” and never “stick-around”.

    Serves them right, they also believe in climate-change and over-population, if you try to argue against this unrealted matter; you are a shovenist pig who doesn’t care for nature. Hippy women think it is natural, indeed their unquestionable right, to act like a self-righteous slut and then whinge about oppression/inequality. They have no capacity to realise or think critically about how they’re being manipulated… and with no man to think for them, heh.

    I remember a teacher saying to a bunch of 14 year old girls in my class, something like “if a man goes with many ladies he is a legend (really?) …but if we do it …we’re called a slut.”
    Most of the kids were in shock; but she thought she was a warrior for women. She was single, childless and insane.

    “The fire that these Jews lit in the 1960s has just kept on burning. It isn’t going to go out until there’s no more fuel – meaning that our traditional culture has been completely exterminated – or until someone stands up and puts it out.”

    It seems the flame is kinda dying on it’s own, I think many smart women are recognising what they really want, and that men want them to be like that.

  39. X says:

    Excellent article. It may seem somewhat perverse, but I do find it amusing when post 40 feminists wail “where are all the real men?”. Perhaps reality mugs them at that point; maybe it is not their fault, they are indoctrinated. It is sad that so many women reach what is real middle-age (over 35) and only then begin to think in terms of having children; drawn into the desperate search to find a suitable male to father their 1.6 children. There are many men in the same position of course, but they still have ‘time on their side’, assuming they haven’t completely fucked their reproductive capabilities with booze, drugs, poor diet and tobacco. So, in many ways the reformed feminist’s sad lament “where are all the real men?” is as potent a comment on the malaise of modern mmanhood as it is a sorrowful dirge on the folly of feminism.

    • Aservant says:

      All true X,

      And although many men are finding themselves without a suitable mate at a later age as you have mentioned, the male psyche can adapt much better to this situation. Many men have a capacity to “lone wolf” and find peace, solitude and happiness living as such. For almost all women, this is impossible. Women are much more herd-like, social creatures. When circumstances force them to become “lone wolves”, the results are usually pretty ugly. You will almost always see that older, single women become super bitter bitches, or they become control freaks, obessive, pathologically ambitious, looking to compete with men and everyone in every aspect.

  40. Atlee Yarrow says:

    “as an attack on males and masculinity” = misandry

    How great is this informational story at the same time other stories are breaking out of Germany over the same or similar ideas and concepts.

    Twitter hashtag: #aufschrei

  41. Pingback: Feminism: A Jewish War on Femininity | Destroy Zionism!

  42. Excellent article.

    Just look at this list of Jewish feminists: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_feminists

    There is a men’s rights movement today, a reaction to the consequences of feminism, but it is misguided in some ways.

    • James says:

      They are all too PC to name the Jew though. It’s a shame, because many of them understand how ridiculous feminism is, but they refuse to examine the root of the problem.

  43. James says:

    This is one of those pieces that hits very close to home. I’m nearly 30, and have a lot of close female friends. I love them dearly and thoroughly enjoy their company. But their blase attitudes towards abortion trouble me, and it’s not even worth the time or effort to discuss with them why abortion (and particularly late-term abortion) is unnatural and has no place in a decent society, because they are too far gone with the Jewish social engineering that began decades before they were born.

    I also see the effect feminism has had on the way they treat the man in their life. The callous lack of empathy they can display, which comes with virtually no warning has often left me and my male friends shellshocked, wondering what the fuck just happened. It’s not manly to bitch and whine about such things to them, so I don’t. But I constantly see them showing a level of emotional disregard that most men simply care for their women too much to visit upon them.

    Long story short, it’s getting a lot fucking worse out there for both genders, however men seem to be better at noticing this, with so many women honestly believing they’ve been liberated from something.

    Thanks again for a thought provoking piece.

    • James2 says:

      “The callous lack of empathy they can display, which comes with virtually no warning”

      This proto-psychopathic behaviour, indoctrinated easily into women, scares me too. It is as if they have been emotionally debased.

  44. Veritas says:

    Great article Andre. Filipina women are virtually immune to the anti-male and anti-family enemy propaganda which I have seen many personal examples of. It is too bad white women generally lack that strength. It is paramount that white women wake the heck up and soon! In the Western world, women have been given more power in a heterosexual relationships by the JWO so as to weaken the strength, natural harmony and balance that can be achieved in a healthy patriarchal family situation. A innocent man can be thrown in jail and kicked out of his house with a single phone call the Stalinist JWO police state gulag. It seems that white women have been tricked into having a laundry list of demands for white men to even be considered as a mate. Most of us are simply not millionaires by the age of 20, especially in a anti-male environment with affirmative action and University non-white acceptance advantages which are seldom mentioned.
    I’m not entirely placing the blame on our women, especially given the insights from you article, and the fact that they are on the receiving end of mass brainwashing, however, they do deserve constructive criticism so as to understand that they are half the battle in helping us good white men construct healthy families again. We can only go so far to make this happen due to the aforementioned facts. If this is not accomplished to a certain level, we are doomed as we can’t force women to have children. Some of us may even go back to Europe to start families as a last resort. Our enemies understand that by controlling the hand that rocks the cradle, they may be able to fulfill their treacherous schemes. Jewish women preach to White women to hate their men and never have a family or children, especially white children (interracial is endorsed by the enemy of course). They obviously know how to subvert natural instincts (it takes years obviously) Yet, these Jewish leaders secretly and hypocritically do not even believe anything they say. For instance, you find that Naomi Wolf has a family and at least 1 child knowing that their message, which is entirely directed at white women causes many of them to distance themselves from patriarchal white men likely preventing them from have children. Wolf of course is ensuring her genes are passed on and nurtured in a stable (likely patriarchal) family while at the same time encouraging white women that already have a family to divorce with the poisonous messages. It is obvious that these feminists are working against the true needs and lifestyle that would make a normal woman happy.

    • Andre says:

      Thank you.

      Wolf is actually divorced from her Jew husband, who was a speech-writer for Bill Clinton. But you are correct that the Jews generally tend to make sure they reproduce.

      I asked a Jewish acquaintance from New York, just a few years older than me, about divorce, and he said he didn’t know a single person who’s parent’s were divorced. Of course, all of his friends were Jews. He said that all of his friends who married Jews stayed married.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>