Or it was, a few hours ago. I guess this isn’t getting posted until after midnight, unless you live in California. Experienced some internet problems this week.
Anyway. Here be it.
Some Observations of Non-White Immigrants in Greece
Please note that all of this is based on personal observation, over a relatively short period of time. Anyone who has had more experience in Greece, or other parts of Europe flooded with the various hordes, is welcome to correct anything that they may see as being wrongly portrayed here.
There are all sorts of savages running around Athens, and I have made it a point to observe them. They are pretty well all Muslims.
Firstly, it is shocking how involvement in criminality is virtual universal among immigrant populations. Or, maybe that isn’t shocking, in theory, and it is simply shocking to witness it.
The least criminal, and generally least aggressive/threatening, are the Bangladeshis. All of these people I have come across have been friendly and respectful, and they are most often engaged in some sort of productive business; granted, they are draining the economy with these businesses, in a way that is totally unfair to the local population, sending the profits overseas and taking away opportunities that could otherwise go to Greeks, but we can note that this is much better than the behavior of the other groups.
The worst folk here are the Arabs. They, along with a small portion of the Pakistani and and a larger portion of the black African population working with them on lower levels, run most, if not all of the drugs and foreign prostitutes. Arabs are also the most likely to assault and rob people on the street, and tend to give the most hateful stares at locals and White/Asian tourists.
Though the Pakistanis are sexually depraved, and as likely as the Arabs to make crude statements to White women, they are more likely than the Arabs to run a cigarette or mobile phone shop and attempt to make an ‘honest’ living. Pakis do not appear to be heavily involved in drugs and prostitution, though they do, as mentioned, sometimes work in lower levels of these industries for the Arabs running them. Pakis can also be seen selling bottles of water and umbrellas – as well as a number of useless items, such as needle-threaders and children’s goo-toys – on the street. Often times they will work in groups and try to pickpocket tourists.
The Gypsies are possibly the most annoying. They do what everyone knows them to do, playing their accordions in your face and passing a hat around, demanding a bribe before they agree to stop this infernal noise. The children also beg, of course, along with the old folk, often times accenting their beggary with the sale of packets of tissues.
The Turks are somewhat more civilized than all of the rest, having, as they do, the most White blood in their veins. Some of them are actually White enough to pass for Greek. They are mainly here to find work, and there are not great numbers of them, as they are a group more welcome in Germany than the rest of the hordes.
Finally, the black Africans are the most scary – walking around in robes, often with tribal scar-markings on their simian faces – but again, less likely to attack than the Arabs. The blacks work directly for the Arabs in the drug trade, but the only prostitutes they are capable of running
Take note that these different groups are as likely to fight with one another as they are to fight with the local population. This, I find interesting.
Some Observations of White Immigrants in Greece
Along with the savage hordes, there are also a good number of White immigrants from non-EU countries (or recently inducted EU countries) living and/or working in Greece.
The main problem with these groups is that in a situation of economic collapse, it is not the least bit helpful to have your wages undercut by foreigners of any kind, even if they are not particularly problematic otherwise, and tend to integrate well in the second generation. The problems with these people, I believe, would work themselves out in the same way that the problems with Irish and Italian immigrants worked themselves out in the United States, all things being equal.
The Romanians and Bulgarians appear to be more difficult than the Albanians and Slavs, as a rule.
Romanians and Bulgarians seem almost bloodthirsty in their obsessive self-protection, but this is mainly manifest only in the undercutting of labor. Still, it makes them less likely to integrate on a social level, and more likely to be seen as weird outsiders, even after a generation has been born here.
Albanians are closer to Greeks genetically, and, if not Muslim, culturally as well. Many of the Albanian immigrants are actually ethnically Greek. Still, they suffer mental problems from communism, in the same way that the others do.
Two Instances of Black Sexual Behavior Expose the Fact that These People are Operating on a Totally Variant Psychological Framework
I came across two slightly older stories of black sexual deviancy this week that I think are worth mentioning, as they do well in illustrating the totally irreconcilable differences between the psychological planes on which our two races are functioning.
The first story is that of this guy
The second is that of this guy
Blacks, having evolved in a different environment than we Whites, possess a completely different sexual nature. Everyday we can see news stories which illustrate this fact, these two just happen to be more extreme than most, and thus perhaps especially helpful in illustrating the concept.
Endless, Circular Scott Roberts Debate
As some may have noted, I have not responded to any of the comments by Scott Roberts on my last article, which dealt with the disagreement we had as well as my understanding of the biological Jew. This was not because I don’t have time (though I don’t really), but because I do not feel I have anything else to say, and see no reason to keep going around in circles.
I have made my position clear: I believe that we need to go on evidence, and that drawing conclusions without evidence is irresponsible and silly, particularly when much simpler explanations exist.
To me, the concept of viewing everything as a massive conspiracy is a mindset which is destructive and very difficult to escape. It begins with the basic assumption, and then facts are manipulated to fit the agenda. Given the nature of the thing, being as it does not rely on factual evidence to support it, any and all facts can be construed in order to fit the pre-decided conclusion. It is a super-secret conspiracy, so all evidence which exists to prove that no such conspiracy exists can be taken as media manipulation designed to cover it up.
All arguments presented by Scott already assume that there is a secret conspiracy, with a secret plan, and he is thus far unwilling to entertain the idea that it is possible that no such thing exists. So, when I say that it makes perfect sense, without the need for a conspiracy, that the US industry would move to China, given the fact that producing in China is so much cheaper than producing in the US, he says “they wouldn’t do that, because it wouldn’t fit into the secret plan.” When we point out the obvious tension between the US and China, and the trillions of dollars being poured into the conflict between the two nations, Scott says “of course – they have to do this to cover up their secret plan.”
There is no ability, it seems, to consider the possibility that he could be wrong. The same goes for the other supporters of the conspiracy/secret plan theory, of course. Scott is not an isolated individual (though this ‘secret body of invisible pure blooded Jews who operate from behind the scenes but for which no trace of evidence exists because they are so secret’ bit does appear to be particular to Scott – I have heard no one else suggest this, and have found his persistence on this issue in particular to be representative of the larger problem of simply making things up, as with this, he isn’t even trying to defend it).
Scott has taken issue with the fact that I have compared his approach to the likes of Alex Jones and David Icke, and suggested that I meant this to be purposefully insulting. This, I have not meant. He is, most certainly, doing the same thing that Alex Jones and David Icke do: coming up with a theory about a secret plan by an invisible group and weaving all facts into this apparently baseless theory. I compare him to them because of the identical method used – a method which I do not see anyone else using – not because I want to insult him. The ‘secret pure Jews’ bit is especially reminiscent of David Icke’s theory about reptile people: a secret invisible body which you have to assume exists because if they didn’t then they wouldn’t.
All the Jews I see running things – actually, literally running things – are of mixed European and Jewish blood. You can see them. They are there, on the TV. The idea that in order to explain why they are there, we need to invent another group that is hiding behind them makes no sense to me, at all.
For the last time, for those in the comments section who are too dense to grasp it thus far:
I am aware that Jews work together on the local, national and international level.
The entire article was meant to explain the way this cooperation works. That was the entire topic. And yet, you have people commenting, claiming that I “don’t believe Jews work together.”
I really have no idea how to respond to this, at all. It strikes me as trolling, possible Hasbarats in the woodpile attempting to skew the words that simply could not have been anymore clear, but at the same time, it appears that the discussion itself may simply be too complicated for many people to grasp. Scott himself appears to be missing the core concept, continually arguing with things that I have not said, or even seemed to imply.
So, maybe if I was capable of making myself clearer, we would have less disagreement. I am not sure.
Lastly, Scott has decided that the only reason I would not accept baseless assumptions about the secret invisible secret plan of the secret invisible ‘pure Jews’ is that I want to harbor ‘false hope.’ That this is what it has come to is shocking and horrible to me.
Let me say – yet again – that my view on this is identical to that of Joseph Goebbels, William Pierce and Kevin MacDonald, as well as that of all other prominent intellectual antisemites. It is not some crazy thing I have pulled out of thin air. It is the default view, which antisemites have held since the advent of scientific racism, when their stopped being a need for the Jew to exist as a devil monster.
I have made my points as clear as I possibly can at this point in time.
Oh, last thing – let me remind people that I am a reader-funded individual, running two reader-funded sites, and that donations are always very appreciated, and every little bit definitely helps. I don’t expect anyone to give much, just anything they are able to give.
Thanks to those who have already given. I am doing my best here, and it means very much to me on a personal level when people show that they consider what I am doing important enough to support.