Jew Capitalism: This pretty well sums it up.
Therefore [Fascism] is a spiritualized conception, itself the result of the general reaction of modern times against the flabby materialistic positivism of the nineteenth century. Anti-positivistic, but positive: not skeptical, nor agnostic, nor pessimistic, nor passively optimistic, as are, in general, the doctrines (all negative) that put the center of life outside man, who with his free will can and must create his own world. Fascism desires an active man, one engaged in activity with all his energies: it desires a man virilely conscious of the difficulties that exist in action and ready to face them. It conceives of life as a struggle, considering that it behooves man to conquer for himself that life truly worthy of him, creating first of all in himself the instrument (physical, moral, intellectual) in order to construct it. Thus for the single individual, thus for the nation, thus for humanity.
–Benito Mussolini, The Doctrine of fascism
Here’s another short piece on the whole Jew free market scam. It is a response to a commenter on the last piece. I want to make sure there isn’t any confusion at all about this, and only the most severe casualties of the Jew brainwashing remain incapable of grasping these simple concepts.
His words are in bold.
***
Free markets exist to benefit everyone. Free markets = voluntary exchange, end of story. They benefit consumers, workers, and capitalists.
China is not a 100 percent command economy at all, its growth is due to the fact that it has transitioned to a more market economy. It’s still economically inferior to the US, which definitely is not free market in the first place.
http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/china/overview
What’s the problem with destroying small businesses if large corporations are more economically efficient and provide cheaper products? This means more wealth, so if you’re concerned about the well-being of our people why would you be against Wal-Mart?
Well then, that’s how I’d deal with Jews taking over finance – mass deportation. Boom. Problem solved. No need for economic central planning.
***
What China transferred to was an economic system very similar to Fascism. For example, small independently-owned cellphone stores compete with one another, on the streets of any Chinese city, but the two major cellphone carriers are owned by a government monopoly. In order to ensure efficiency, both of the government owned cell carriers have independent management, and they are set to compete with one another to provide the most beneficial service, which is decided by consumers.
The oil and all other energy companies, alcohol and tobacco companies, the banks, and so on are state monopolies. The government puts price controls on almost everything. When multinationals operate in China, they are required to have a state-controlled local partner.
If you and the World Bank want to define this as a “market economy” then go ahead, but it surely cannot be compared to the Jew capitalism you are promoting.
The philosophy behind the logic of “cheaper consumer products=more wealth=healthier society” is so fundamentally Jewish that it is sickening to me that any gentile could ever endorse it, but it is also a complete and demonstrated fallacy, which has been explained millions of times, but which I will go ahead and summarize for you.
Obviously, at the time Walmart came around, we were already in a situation where production was becoming extremely centralized and moving off shore, which in itself was highly negative, but the centralization of distribution made all of it worse. Walmart crushed local businesses of all sorts all across the entire country, destroying everything about these communities, and ultimately crushing their local economies and lowering the quality of living. Very cheap low-quality goods are only good so long as you have a job with which to earn an income to buy them. In every small town in the United States, the butcher, the tailor, the dress shop, the cobbler, the gun store, the mechanic, the grocer, the newsstand, the bookstore, the furniture store, the pet store and virtually every other retail merchant lost their business to this multinational giant owned by the stock market capitalists. The money which was going back into the local economy is now going somewhere else. When Walmart goes into a town, the ultimate result is that all of these people who lost their jobs to Walmart have to go work as slaves at Walmart.
The inside of a Walmart is one of the most horrible places a human being can go. I, and I dare say that majority of human beings with souls, would much rather go into multiple local independent businesses, where the owners have a face and a name, and buy their products and contribute to the local economy while solidifying community values than shop at a multinational hell of cheaply made Asian goods and crush the local economy for the benefit of big city stock holders and Jewish business executives.
You would no doubt argue that this was somehow “voluntary” and thus by the metaphysical law of the Jew which you hold as unquestionable, they deserved what they got. Though I personally do not feel it would be okay for us to surrender everything about our society over to the Jews, even if it was agreed on by the masses as the best option, we get here into definitions of consent. Firstly, it was individuals who chose to go to Walmart for the cheaper goods rather than continue to support their own local economies, and it is the community which suffers. Here is your Jewish “individualism.”
Putting all power of decision on the individual is ridiculous, as it amounts to expecting them each to work through a complicated economic process in their heads and come to an educated decision about future outcomes. I guarantee that if you went back and asked intelligent and perceptive denizens of small towns if they had the chance to take back their embrace of Walmart and the destruction of their communities, they would unanimously say “yes.” Of course by your Jewish ideology, they should have each been as knowledgeable as a professional economists and made a collective decision, against the propaganda images presented to them, to avoid Walmart because it meant that in five years their entire society would be enslaved to it, and the fact that they didn’t do this means that are casualties of the market and not fit to be anything other than slaves to Jews.
This core doctrine of “voluntary choice” is a complete and utter fallacy, and Jews are 100% responsible for it. It assumes that each individual exists as a genius, in a vacuum where he is not influenced by subversive advertisement and centrally manufactured social norms. It is a vicious ideology, designed solely to victimize and exploit. I cannot imagine anything more transparent than this. All of you pushing this need to ask yourselves why. It is in no way necessary. Heroic White men, 100 years ago, showed us a better way.
Then we have the fact that consumerism itself is a social disease. Go into a Walmart and ask yourself what percentage of what they are selling is required for living and what percentage is simply frivolous material trinkets designed to fill a void in people’s souls. We have a system where the media is capable of creating new “needs.” This negates all of this “supply and demand” gibberish, when not only supply, but also demand, is dictated by a central power.
Everything about the existence of Walmart is negative. It doesn’t “create wealth,” it funnels wealth out of communities into the pockets of capitalist vultures. It destroys society. Most of us are too young to remember life before corporate retail outlets, but ask an old person about it. Ask if it was better when we had communities, instead of international corporations dictating the form of our existence.
Ridding our society of Jews would not automatically solve every problem that has been created by Jews. If we were going to keep their systems of exploitation and abuse in place, why would we even bother to get rid of them in the first place? The Jew is our enemy because of his behavior. He has infected our society and souls with destructive ideologies and concepts of what it means to be human, as a means of warfare against us. The first and foremost Jew philosophy that needs done away with is this idea that the level of products a person is able to consume is the gauge by which he measures the level of meaning in his life.
The purpose of human existence is not to support the economy. The only justification for the existence of an economy is that it serves the people, otherwise it has no purpose and thus no right to exist. It is only the Jew who came up with the idea that the core of the human experience must be defined by production and consumption. In order to get past this, we have to reformulate our image of what it means to be a human being, as the Jew has so fully crushed it. You sickening comments are evidence of this in the extreme.
Materialism is fundamentally of the Jew, and its infiltration into White society is why we have given up our souls to these monsters. When we rise, we shall not simply crush the Jew physically, by removing his person from amongst us, we shall also crush him ideologically and spiritually, by cleansing our souls of his subversive doctrines, in order that we may reclaim the divine purpose of our race.
You can’t create wealth by fiat, Andre.
You want to smash capitalism as it currently exists? Great, so do we.
Where are Whites eating “ungraded” food, Andre?
No reptilians allowed here, go to David Icke’s website.
You absolutely can create wealth by fiat, that is just gibberish Jew talk.
Who are your “we”?
No. Proclamations and guns can only redistribute wealth, the creation of wealth requires toil in the conversion of matter into useful forms. Perhaps it is better to redistribute wealth by force, that is not my concern. The current redistribution sucks, and it is about as “free market” as Adolf Hitler was “Jewish.”
If you are asking about who I referred to as “we” above: libertarians; right, left, center, or not-on-the-map. William Godwin to Hans Herman Hoppe.
If you are asking who my “we” is in general: Whites who are intelligent and honest.
Yes, we should definitely try the Libertarian program for wealth creation – international free trade and the free movement of labor across national borders might just pull us out of this slump that was caused by “the government” putting all these restrictions on the “free market”! It makes perfect sense!
Sorry man, but your plan just isn’t working. And I know – there is some complicated reason why international free trade and open borders only led to the the crisis it has led to because of “the government,” and how globalization is only a universal exploitative race to the bottom because of certain technical oversights, as well as how our government is something other than a tool of international finance capitalism, but I’ve heard it and I am not impressed – it is all just more Jew gibberish, designed to rot out your brain and trick you into supporting things that are against your own interests and that of your people.
You are no doubt as tired of hearing about how fundamentally Jewish your theology is, really a secular form of Judaism, as I am of saying it, so I won’t again belabor the point.
I will note that a redistribution of wealth would be a very good step in the right direction, and this could be done through policy. This is massive wealth in America, it is just all held by Jews and other capitalists.
Right now, the only way to create wealth would be to shut off this free trade system that you promote. Instead of acknowledging that I’ve already said that, and coming up with a response to it, you instead pretend I didn’t say it and repeat again that libertarianism will somehow create wealth for White people in first world countries. This is like arguing with a Social Democrat in a Munich Beer Hall. If you have some counter-points to make, make them and I will respond, but don’t come on here after I’ve already debunked your cult and simply say “we need libertarianism” without even presenting an argument, it just makes you look like a hasbarat.
Explain how this Jewish cult doctrine of internationalism is even slightly compatible with racial nationalism, or stop evangelizing for it on my website.
I oppose international free trade, so go bark up another tree with that bullshit.
If you consider the US economy a “free market,” you are merely experiencing the myopia of the present day. FDR’s administration was paying farmers to destroy their crops so that market forces would increase the prices they could sell their remaining goods at – and FDR’s America was radically libertarian by today’s standards
Jews are the people of book-writing, they have their noses in every ideology. Racial nationalism, anyone?
Shutting down the flow of labor, capital, and consumables across international borders does not create wealth, it redistributes wealth to the proletariat and enterprenureate of our own political unit. I support it.
“repeat again that libertarianism will somehow create wealth for White people in first world countries.”
Where did I say that?
Oh, right. I didn’t. You’re just arguing with the voices in your head.
If you oppose international free trade, why do you call yourself a “libertarian”? International free trade is one of the prime tenets of that theology. Even those who have gone soft on their open-borders policy, saying that they need to abolish the government before opening up the borders to the hordes, still stick by the international free trade policy. Even Ron Paul supported it – and he is certainly a soft Libertarian.
So, I guess you have created your own version of “Libertarianism” which only you adhere to. That definitely makes it difficult to discuss.
As far as this No True Scotsman “not really free market, blah blah blah” it is the same noise I hear from the communists about the Soviet Union – “not really true communist, blah blah blah.” The fact is that this is the way your free market system works – resources are centralized by a minority through the free trade system, and then those who have centralized resources use the power they hold to organize a state apparatus that reinforces their power.
It is exceedingly depressing that I must continue to repeat such simple things to what I presume are grown adults. A child could understand this. An open market demands resource centralization, given that the allocation of resources is based on the capacity of an entity to produce a profit, and the capacity to produce a profit is based on the scale of the operation which is in turn based on amount of resources possessed (this last bit is due to a multitude of glaringly obvious factors that tend to escape the ideological libertarian – these include standardization and the efficiency of production systems which require a large-scale investment; a shoe factory costs thousands of times more to built than a cobbler shop, but produces thousands of times more efficiently).
And yes, the Jews are racially nationalist. They also use electricity, sleep in beds and have two eyes and a nose on their faces. Racial nationalism is a basic protection mechanism for any people. The fact that the Jews are racially nationalist does not somehow mean that racial nationalism is a Jewish concept. It is a natural state, a biological response to the modern world of nation-states. Libertarianism, on the other hand, is an idiotic ideological abstraction which has repeatedly been shown to be absolutely nonviable, and which was created entirely by Jews. There is no analog in the natural world to individualism, or the individual caring first for his own needs above all others. It is alien and unnatural, and only a Jew could have thought it up.
As to the witty remark at the end there – you said:
1. You want to smash “smash capitalism as it currently exists” because it doesn’t create wealth
2. You are a Libertarian
3. You are White
Forgive me for inferring that you were saying that Libertarianism would “create wealth for White people in first world countries.” I am deeply sorry if I have put words in your mouth. Frankly though sir, I have zero interest in playing word games with you. If you are promoting Libertarianism for some other reason than that you think it would be economically helpful to White nations, but yet do not feel a need to tell us what that reason is – perhaps it is a secret – then please, go away from here. I am sure you can find fertile ground to spread this gibberish on one of the “patriot” sites who enjoy confusing themselves with nonsense. Here at Total Fascism, we are about real solutions to real problems, and we do not have time for endless circular arguments with Jewish propagandists or the victims of Jewish propaganda.
Could you write more articles about the jewish influence in China and other Asian countries? Do they have an enormous grip in China and asian countries like they have in the USA and western civilization in general?
I would like to read some articles about that, personally. I don’t really have any information on it, and it isn’t for a lack of searching.
As far as I know, the only Jewish influence in China is through what remains of the communist system (which isn’t very much) and the western media that they import (which is way too much). I lived there, and it is definitely not a society run by Jews. Jews do not allow prosperity, as we saw with the Soviet Union, and as we are now seeing with America and western Europe, and China is most certainly prosperous. They also are unable to keep from running things themselves, at least in partial view – usually right out in full view – and there are no such visible Jews in China. A “Jews secretly run China” conspiracy theory would have to provide a whole lot of new information, as well as introduce some new lines of logic/perspective, in order to be even considered.
But the entertainment media is a powerful thing, and I think it will be their downfall. Very few Chinese people are interested in “democracy” at this point, but more and more of the youth are talking about it, and as soon as they lose control of the state through the Jew parliamentary system, they are going to get a private bank, a free market and a total collapse of their entire society. The reason this is even possible, in my opinion, is that though they fixed the economy that Mao screwed all up, they didn’t reintroduce a religious system, and so there is a void that this emotional western media is filling.
I guess I could write an article elaborating on what I’ve just said here.
“The inside of a Walmart is one of the most horrible places a human being can go. I, and I dare say that majority of human beings with souls, would much rather go into multiple local independent businesses, where the owners have a face and a name>
LOLOLOLOL, your cognitive dissonance must be a bitch – Walmart can drive out all local businesses because consumers would rather go to Walmart, but consumers don’t like going to Walmart. And you say that we Austro-libertarians engage in Jewish-like mental gymnastics.
What do you mean, exactly? They go there because a corporate conglomerate is able to charge between 30 and 60 percent less.
My point was that the customers’ choice shows that they value savings over seeing a face and name. You can argue that you aesthetically prefer one business to another, but most people seem to disagree with you.
It is the customers’ choice to watch porno and do heroin. Do you think children look forward to growing up to be porno watching heroin addicts? The basic foundation of you’re argument just simply is not very good. Expecting the uninformed personal decisions of masses of individuals to come together and somehow, by random chance, result in a desirable social situation is positively nonsensical.
This is really a metaphysical argument you’re presenting here, as it surely is grounded in no form of traditional logic.
But porn and heroin are addictive – they are a form of enslavement (to one’s desires).
I’m not sure how Walmart is inherently negative. Yes, some small business owners do lose, but everyone else in the community gains.
I don’t know anyone who truly likes to shop at Wal Mart! Most everyone does out of necessity because Wal Mart has driven all competition out of business. When I go to a Wal Mart, 70-80% of the shoppers there are blacks and mexicans whom I imagine simply don’t know any better. The ignorance of the lowest common denominator is why Wal Mart prevails! Besides, if we’re to determine quality based off of the choice of the uninformed masses, than Lil’ Wayne is one of the greatest artistic talents of our time! I find that laughable!
“I’m not sure how Walmart is inherently negative. Yes, some small business owners do lose, but everyone else in the community gains.”
This is simply not the case. Massive superstore monopolies reduce prices to such an extent that certainly, in the initial stages, more people can afford more. However, in the constant drive to push down prices and retain custom, massive food distribution corporations force their suppliers to over compete, eventually strangling-off competition entirely and reducing those producers who are still able to function to practically starve to death financially.
Because the producers and suppliers can no longer feed these massive corporations, and the insatiable hunger of ever growing numbers of consumers, a form of stealth inflation naturally occurs. Thus we witness food scandals, such as horse meat introduced into (or in lieu of) beef products, cat litter and clay in cigars, and watered-down whiskey. No doubt there are hundreds of other undisclosed instances of this type but, and as anyone who appreciates how our “free and democratic” system functions, what we are permitted to obverse is normally just the tip of an iceberg.
The reason this is an inflationary phenomenon is due to the fact that the consumers are not getting wealthier; the quality of the produce is decreasing; while the cost of the goods remain the same. Therefore, Walmart et al, are actively decreasing the specification of what it sells but retaining the prices of days gone by. The consumers will continue to shovel down a lower quality of crap and will continue to do so until their living standards increase. This will not happen, however, in the current climate of Western terminal decline.
To the extent that competition is “straggled” off, efficiency is improved. If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen. You bitch and moan about evil Jew capitalists, but then turn around and cry about how they get financially starved by the market. If someone cannot compete in the market, he shouldn’t be in.
“Because the producers and suppliers can no longer feed these massive corporations”: what? That doesn’t make any sense. Why would they be “straggled” if they’re necessary to “feed” these massive corporations?
Where do I “bitch and moan about evil Jew capitalists”? I don’t read that anywhere in the comment. Please do not project.
You clearly know nothing about large scale distribution and the tight (if any) margins producers are forced to endure because of the buying power of massive corporations. This situation can only result in collapse and/or stealth inflation – as I outlined above – and not healthy competition. If eating ungraded crap from China (because no one else can compete) is your idea if a desirable economic future then you are probably earning enough not subsist on ungraded crap. The dreamworld that is unrestrained capitalism is just that…
Regards,
N.G.
“If eating ungraded crap from China (because no one else can compete) is your idea if a desirable economic future then you are probably earning enough not subsist on ungraded crap.”
So it’s better for poor people to not eat at all rather than to eat food more likely to be damaging. Have you talked this idea over with people who actually have serious problems obtaining food? Pretty sure they’d see your desire as a desire to murder them.
No, it would be better for poor people to not have the boot of capitalism on their necks, and have their basic human rights to dignified labor and a living wage restored, which would allow them to stop eating this sickening ungraded food which gives them all these diseases and makes them obese.
What are you saying, exactly?
If you are talking about starving Africans or something – that isn’t my problem.
Excellent article andrew, you hit them right on the nail.
I live in Europe : megamonstersupermarkets are never spoken about in politicla debate but are the number problem in enslaving the people and giving our youngster a hopeless future of a job of filling shelves or in the best case a job of managing of filling shelves. All those supermarketchains not only own all retail business, they also own fastfoods, hotels and on and on. We have been robbed. They are all owned by a few families, mostly jews, and they should be led the scaffold for their satanic trade in the exploitation of human, animal and environmental sacrifices.
Yeah, it is all a humongous scam to steal away people’s right to an independent livelihood by centralizing everything. How a person who is against the Jews could defend this is baffling.
We absolutely need a “market economy” on the ground level – which local diner can make the best burgers, which local waffle joint has the sweetest waitresses, which local mechanic can change your oil the quickest, which local butcher can remember how you like your sausages, which local farmer has the freshest tomatoes – but in order for this to exist in the post-industrial world, it must be protected by massive government regulation. The natural monopolies – oil, airlines, utilities, electronics companies, etc. – must be controlled by the government. It is all pretty well obvious, unless you’ve been brainwashed by Jews.
why do we need price controls? i accept your brutally extreme philosophy may form a better economic architecture than liberterianism, and certainly our current mess, but if you control the medium (currrency) on behalf of the people (/worker), isn’t price controls throwing the baby out with the bath water?
Here’s a good youtube video about him.
http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=qiKMmrG1ZKU&desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DqiKMmrG1ZKU
Regarding materialism and consumer brainwashing. Do you know of Edward Bernays? He pioneered crowd psychology, as well as modern media brainwashing!
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Bernays
Yes, I’ve read his book, quite a long time ago. He was a Jew.
Adam Curtis made a documentary series back in 2002 about Freud and Bernays. When I watched it I had just begun understanding the Jewish question and found it very eye-opening.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Century_of_the_Self
Yes I watched it back when it came out. I recall it being very well done.
Great Article
But you have to realize that China plays the game. What I am curious about does China have safe guards up to protect themselves from the jew?
Another thing I think the Chinese respect the Jews as a race and what they have accomplished.
After the jew is done with the good ol USA they will need another host. It might be china.
Ethnocentric China will be hard to break, not like us here in the USA.
Yes, I realize China is far from an ideal society. I personally do not like the Chinese as a race – though that is a personal issue and I surely have great respect for them as a people – and I am not sure how much that taints my view of their culture. It seems to me that they have bought much too much into the Jew materialism, rejecting their ancient social order which sought purpose in heaven, and that this will eventually cause their society to collapse – by way of the Jew, of course.
Whatever the case, China has an amazing economy at present, and this fully crushes the childish idiocy of these Libertarian Jews that “planned economies don’t work.” Though I knew that the Jews were claiming that China was “opening a market economy,” the WB article linked here was a bit shocking. How can you call a country that enforces price controls on virtually everything a “market economy”? There you of course see the operations of Jewspeak – the ridiculous though previously non-falsifiable statement that “planned economies don’t work” was falsified by China, and so instead of re-framing their deranged argument, they just say “no it wasn’t – price controls and government ownership of all major corporations is secretly free market!” And of course the gullible victims of the Jews brainwashing repeat it uncritically.
Andrew. Agreed. The Chinese are much different than say the Japanese.
Saxon says:
February 28, 2013 at 11:52 pm
Joint Venture shareholdings of foreigners or foreign companies cannot exceed 49% in China. If the Jew tries
to cause confusion he will lose his money!
Andre:
A Jew once threatened me physically was over Wal Mart, the Jew was speaking up for Wal Mart, I took the opposite position at a Public Hearing. I laughed in his face, which was obstructed by his rather large nose.
Repoted today:
Wal-Mart Struggles to Restock Store Shelves as U.S. Sales Slump
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-02-27/wal-mart-s-slowness-stock-shelves-worsens-as-sales-stay-s.html
Yeah, we are now paying the cost of low prices.
It’s a bit like how that drug “ecstasy” releases all the serotonin from your brain and then makes it so you can’t feel feelings anymore because your brain is too damaged to produce proper serotonin levels. We gorged ourselves on these cheap products for the quick buzz, and now the show’s over.
Andre, you have hit the nail on the head. People can make informed and intelligent choices only if there is an undisturbed flow of pluralistic viz. alternative information. and viewpoints. Even the
dumbest American should have come to know by now who are the owners of the
media. If there is a constant flow of information that serves only one particular group of
people how can you go out and hold a “democratic” election? And how can you
prevent developments designed to interrupt the forward and
backward flow of money in local communities with the aim to syphon the money to
offshore accounts where it is serving the international ambitions of International Jewry? Many things have been said about you here and on other sites, but I can
confirm to you that all the thoughts you are offering are thoughts supported by
reasonable deduction.
If that wasn’t the case, few would bother to say things about me.
Thank you.
‘Chinas still economically inferior to the US, which definitely is not free market in the first place.’
hold on there, partner. The United States is broke. Trillions in debt. The only thing we export is scrap and garbage. We import everything, hence everything at walmart being chinese products. Our military industrial complex exists to fight jewish wars for israel, and go in to reinstate our currency when countries decide to junk our worthless fiat currency.
China’s growth is contingent on US demand, and if you look at their average income, they are clearly behind the US.
Anyways, I said it moved TOWARDS a more market economy. I never made the claim that it WAS a market economy.