Therefore [Fascism] is a spiritualized conception, itself the result of the general reaction of modern times against the flabby materialistic positivism of the nineteenth century. Anti-positivistic, but positive: not skeptical, nor agnostic, nor pessimistic, nor passively optimistic, as are, in general, the doctrines (all negative) that put the center of life outside man, who with his free will can and must create his own world. Fascism desires an active man, one engaged in activity with all his energies: it desires a man virilely conscious of the difficulties that exist in action and ready to face them. It conceives of life as a struggle, considering that it behooves man to conquer for himself that life truly worthy of him, creating first of all in himself the instrument (physical, moral, intellectual) in order to construct it. Thus for the single individual, thus for the nation, thus for humanity.
–Benito Mussolini, The Doctrine of fascism
Here’s another short piece on the whole Jew free market scam. It is a response to a commenter on the last piece. I want to make sure there isn’t any confusion at all about this, and only the most severe casualties of the Jew brainwashing remain incapable of grasping these simple concepts.
His words are in bold.
Free markets exist to benefit everyone. Free markets = voluntary exchange, end of story. They benefit consumers, workers, and capitalists.
China is not a 100 percent command economy at all, its growth is due to the fact that it has transitioned to a more market economy. It’s still economically inferior to the US, which definitely is not free market in the first place.
What’s the problem with destroying small businesses if large corporations are more economically efficient and provide cheaper products? This means more wealth, so if you’re concerned about the well-being of our people why would you be against Wal-Mart?
Well then, that’s how I’d deal with Jews taking over finance – mass deportation. Boom. Problem solved. No need for economic central planning.
What China transferred to was an economic system very similar to Fascism. For example, small independently-owned cellphone stores compete with one another, on the streets of any Chinese city, but the two major cellphone carriers are owned by a government monopoly. In order to ensure efficiency, both of the government owned cell carriers have independent management, and they are set to compete with one another to provide the most beneficial service, which is decided by consumers.
The oil and all other energy companies, alcohol and tobacco companies, the banks, and so on are state monopolies. The government puts price controls on almost everything. When multinationals operate in China, they are required to have a state-controlled local partner.
If you and the World Bank want to define this as a “market economy” then go ahead, but it surely cannot be compared to the Jew capitalism you are promoting.
The philosophy behind the logic of “cheaper consumer products=more wealth=healthier society” is so fundamentally Jewish that it is sickening to me that any gentile could ever endorse it, but it is also a complete and demonstrated fallacy, which has been explained millions of times, but which I will go ahead and summarize for you.
Obviously, at the time Walmart came around, we were already in a situation where production was becoming extremely centralized and moving off shore, which in itself was highly negative, but the centralization of distribution made all of it worse. Walmart crushed local businesses of all sorts all across the entire country, destroying everything about these communities, and ultimately crushing their local economies and lowering the quality of living. Very cheap low-quality goods are only good so long as you have a job with which to earn an income to buy them. In every small town in the United States, the butcher, the tailor, the dress shop, the cobbler, the gun store, the mechanic, the grocer, the newsstand, the bookstore, the furniture store, the pet store and virtually every other retail merchant lost their business to this multinational giant owned by the stock market capitalists. The money which was going back into the local economy is now going somewhere else. When Walmart goes into a town, the ultimate result is that all of these people who lost their jobs to Walmart have to go work as slaves at Walmart.
The inside of a Walmart is one of the most horrible places a human being can go. I, and I dare say that majority of human beings with souls, would much rather go into multiple local independent businesses, where the owners have a face and a name, and buy their products and contribute to the local economy while solidifying community values than shop at a multinational hell of cheaply made Asian goods and crush the local economy for the benefit of big city stock holders and Jewish business executives.
You would no doubt argue that this was somehow “voluntary” and thus by the metaphysical law of the Jew which you hold as unquestionable, they deserved what they got. Though I personally do not feel it would be okay for us to surrender everything about our society over to the Jews, even if it was agreed on by the masses as the best option, we get here into definitions of consent. Firstly, it was individuals who chose to go to Walmart for the cheaper goods rather than continue to support their own local economies, and it is the community which suffers. Here is your Jewish “individualism.”
Putting all power of decision on the individual is ridiculous, as it amounts to expecting them each to work through a complicated economic process in their heads and come to an educated decision about future outcomes. I guarantee that if you went back and asked intelligent and perceptive denizens of small towns if they had the chance to take back their embrace of Walmart and the destruction of their communities, they would unanimously say “yes.” Of course by your Jewish ideology, they should have each been as knowledgeable as a professional economists and made a collective decision, against the propaganda images presented to them, to avoid Walmart because it meant that in five years their entire society would be enslaved to it, and the fact that they didn’t do this means that are casualties of the market and not fit to be anything other than slaves to Jews.
This core doctrine of “voluntary choice” is a complete and utter fallacy, and Jews are 100% responsible for it. It assumes that each individual exists as a genius, in a vacuum where he is not influenced by subversive advertisement and centrally manufactured social norms. It is a vicious ideology, designed solely to victimize and exploit. I cannot imagine anything more transparent than this. All of you pushing this need to ask yourselves why. It is in no way necessary. Heroic White men, 100 years ago, showed us a better way.
Then we have the fact that consumerism itself is a social disease. Go into a Walmart and ask yourself what percentage of what they are selling is required for living and what percentage is simply frivolous material trinkets designed to fill a void in people’s souls. We have a system where the media is capable of creating new “needs.” This negates all of this “supply and demand” gibberish, when not only supply, but also demand, is dictated by a central power.
Everything about the existence of Walmart is negative. It doesn’t “create wealth,” it funnels wealth out of communities into the pockets of capitalist vultures. It destroys society. Most of us are too young to remember life before corporate retail outlets, but ask an old person about it. Ask if it was better when we had communities, instead of international corporations dictating the form of our existence.
Ridding our society of Jews would not automatically solve every problem that has been created by Jews. If we were going to keep their systems of exploitation and abuse in place, why would we even bother to get rid of them in the first place? The Jew is our enemy because of his behavior. He has infected our society and souls with destructive ideologies and concepts of what it means to be human, as a means of warfare against us. The first and foremost Jew philosophy that needs done away with is this idea that the level of products a person is able to consume is the gauge by which he measures the level of meaning in his life.
The purpose of human existence is not to support the economy. The only justification for the existence of an economy is that it serves the people, otherwise it has no purpose and thus no right to exist. It is only the Jew who came up with the idea that the core of the human experience must be defined by production and consumption. In order to get past this, we have to reformulate our image of what it means to be a human being, as the Jew has so fully crushed it. You sickening comments are evidence of this in the extreme.
Materialism is fundamentally of the Jew, and its infiltration into White society is why we have given up our souls to these monsters. When we rise, we shall not simply crush the Jew physically, by removing his person from amongst us, we shall also crush him ideologically and spiritually, by cleansing our souls of his subversive doctrines, in order that we may reclaim the divine purpose of our race.